Author Topic: Which Monitor is best?  (Read 5603 times)

2024-06-06, 13:57:13
Reply #15

Nejc Kilar

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
    • View Profile
    • My personal website
If I may suggest so what I found like a good solution for me was to increase the "text size" in Windows. So DPI I have on 125% and text size is set to slightly larger. Found that to be working pretty well for me. I do wear glasses though.

The screen I'm on is equivalent to a 32" 4k display (its the Samsung G95NC).
Nejc Kilar | chaos-corona.com
Educational Content Creator | contact us

2024-06-06, 16:53:06
Reply #16

Basshunter

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 290
    • View Profile
You might just be sitting further away :- ). I use 150perc. for 32" 4K with tripple surround (3x32") and 150perc. for 27"/4K when I am travelling with  single or dual 27" monitors but I sit much closer to that setup.

I use additional 125perc. scaling on top for internet browsing.

Even with my lens or glasses, I couldn't do 125perc. either and I would find 175-200perc. to be very comfortable for text but already problematic with how it condenses all visual elements. It's all compromise sadly for text vs graphic parts.
Apple does 200perc. for 27" 5K resolution, so it's not like you're in some too odd territory :- ).

No way. My eyes are just 45cm (17 inches") away from the monitor. In fact, the text at 125% is even smaller than the text on a WhatsApp chat on my phone. I'm on a 27" Dell U2723QE

2024-09-17, 22:11:00
Reply #17

Vuk

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 114
    • View Profile
I am reviving this thread after some time. Has anyone tried so far the new Dell U4025QW ultrawide IPS black monitor? And any new monitors on the horizon that are worth trying?

2024-09-18, 08:21:31
Reply #18

Juraj

  • Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 4793
    • View Profile
    • studio website
That Dell is very good, the "black-IPS" panels are very decent, but the monitors are very expensive for what you get (which is just slightly better IPS..).

I will write review of recent WOLED monitors (OLED panels from LG, I tried both LG and Asus version). QD-OLED (the Samsung version without polarizer) is not good fit for work. I'll make a post next week.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2024-10-01, 12:49:07
Reply #19

tatarka

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Philips Momentum 27M1N5500ZA/00
does anyone use? any thoughts ?

2024-10-14, 00:32:40
Reply #20

Basshunter

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 290
    • View Profile
I will write review of recent WOLED monitors (OLED panels from LG, I tried both LG and Asus version). QD-OLED (the Samsung version without polarizer) is not good fit for work. I'll make a post next week.

Looking forward to reading this since I’m in search of a new monitor.

2024-10-16, 16:17:23
Reply #21

Juraj

  • Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 4793
    • View Profile
    • studio website
My ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP (not to be confused with QD-OLED panel based UCDM model) took unfortunately 2 more weeks to arrive, I've received it just yesterday. I've sent my 32GS95UE-B back 2 weeks ago as well.
But I presume they will be roughly identical, except for the ABL algorithms which can be fully turned off on Asus, but not on LG.

Shortly, LG implemented super-weird ABL that creates "Vignette" across like 60perc. of the screen, even with PeakBrightness OFF, so uniform SDR brightness.
That makes it impossible to do any professional graphic work because half of your screen is different brightness than the centre. It's not traditional ABL which turns up&down brightness across whole screen.

Because of that, the only WOLED-panel OLED monitor that can be used professionally, is the ASUS version, because Asus allows to turn all this crap OFF in OSD menu. For LG, you need to use special menu that voids warranty and also resets every-time the monitor as much as goes to sleep (so 20 times a day).

I wouldn't consider QD-OLED panels for work because lack of polarizer means they have purple tint in every daylight settings. I presume majority of us aren't gaming vampires so that is big no-no for color-critical work.

Funny thing is that despite the LG 32GS95UE-B and ASUS PG32UCDP being identical monitors, you can get the LG as low as 1100 EUR on Amazon and Asus is 1600+ Euro. ASUS tax in Europe..
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2024-10-16, 16:46:39
Reply #22

Basshunter

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 290
    • View Profile
My ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP (not to be confused with QD-OLED panel based UCDM model) took unfortunately 2 more weeks to arrive, I've received it just yesterday. I've sent my 32GS95UE-B back 2 weeks ago as well.
But I presume they will be roughly identical, except for the ABL algorithms which can be fully turned off on Asus, but not on LG.

Shortly, LG implemented super-weird ABL that creates "Vignette" across like 60perc. of the screen, even with PeakBrightness OFF, so uniform SDR brightness.
That makes it impossible to do any professional graphic work because half of your screen is different brightness than the centre. It's not traditional ABL which turns up&down brightness across whole screen.

Because of that, the only WOLED-panel OLED monitor that can be used professionally, is the ASUS version, because Asus allows to turn all this crap OFF in OSD menu. For LG, you need to use special menu that voids warranty and also resets every-time the monitor as much as goes to sleep (so 20 times a day).

I wouldn't consider QD-OLED panels for work because lack of polarizer means they have purple tint in every daylight settings. I presume majority of us aren't gaming vampires so that is big no-no for color-critical work.

Funny thing is that despite the LG 32GS95UE-B and ASUS PG32UCDP being identical monitors, you can get the LG as low as 1100 EUR on Amazon and Asus is 1600+ Euro. ASUS tax in Europe..

Thanks for your answer. May I ask what monitor you use for color critical work right now?

2024-10-16, 17:08:49
Reply #23

Juraj

  • Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 4793
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Old Benq PD3200U. I pondered updating to some of the faster mini-led IPS panels but I found them quite mediocre (and expensive for such) so when OLED went mainstream this summer I decided now it's finally the time.

The WOLED based LG 32GS95UE-B was absolutely perfectly in every way almost except for the vignette crap (which LG calls "Convex Power Control", apparently to lower power draw, to save electricity.. ? It's not like the monitor doesn't have few additional classic OLED ABL algorithms that you can turn off, but you can't turn off the CPC).
I expect the PG32UCDP to be likewise perfect.

These are gaming monitors though, and they come with some wonky calibrations. The colors were good in all modes, but they feature slightly tweaked gamma profiles where all the profiles have stronger black-clip. This is imho done to make the contrast appear more impressive. OLED have infinite contrast in theory, but in practice, during daylight, there is no strong wow-effect (night-time is something else). So they made this weird 2.2 gamma which crushes blacks. Needs either custom calibration (but only LG offers hardware calibration, Asus relies on ICC profiles, so will be ignored by majority of Windows including Max/Corona) or using Blacks Stabilizer, which is boosts the blacks. That's not exactly calibration... but the result works.

For clamping colors to sRGB space during work, I am using https://github.com/ledoge/novideo_srgb instead of using the OSD profile, which find limited in functionality (and not exactly perfectly calibrated anyway).

At the moment, in 1000 to 2000 Euro budget, you can get mediocre "IPS Black" panels (Contrast 1:2000 is actually just 20perc. more contrast that typical 1:1000 IPS, because of logarithmic perception) with 60HZ and edge back-lighting, mostly so-called "Fast-IPS" panels which barely touch 1:1000 (usually they're 1:850-900 at best) at 120-144HZ at lower price range, or Mini-led based at upper price range, but even with 2000 Zones, you have to turn it off for any non-video work, it's just not sufficient, you would need like 20 000 zones at minimum on 32" monitor.

So 1200-1600 Euro for actual 4K 240HZ 270 Nits SDR brightness DCI-P3 color-gamut OLED monitor... that's pretty amazing. Compared to the above, which is just lot of money for subpar and inferior tech.

Another topic is the baby-sitting (hidden taskbar,etc.. )...
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

Yesterday at 10:47:32
Reply #24

Nejc Kilar

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
    • View Profile
    • My personal website
... (but only LG offers hardware calibration, Asus relies on ICC profiles, so will be ignored by majority of Windows including Max/Corona)...

Hmm are you sure about this though? I've just recently calibrated my screen and the ICC profile that I load in Windows affects both the 3ds Max's / C4D's UI and the Corona VFB - along with all the color managed apps like Affinity / Resolve / PS.

I've tested it with different, wonky ICCs (for a bigger difference) just to see if it really affects things and it appears to do so indeed.

Although yes, hardware calibration is definitely the most reliable option because you are absolutely sure it works in all cases as long as your monitor works :)
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:26:35 by Nejc Kilar »
Nejc Kilar | chaos-corona.com
Educational Content Creator | contact us

Yesterday at 13:39:31
Reply #25

Juraj

  • Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 4793
    • View Profile
    • studio website
I am 100perc. (no 99.9) that 3dsMax is non-calibrated until 2025 version, which does feature OCIO color management and capability to load color profiles. If Corona inside 3dsMax already respects that, I don't know, thought I have some doubts as I haven't seen any release note mentioning compatibility.

Cinema4D had color management for far longer time.

Regardless, NoVideoSRGBClamp is much better solution as it acts like 3D LUT inside OSD, it's super-imposed on top of everything else. It can also load ICC profiles too and do the same.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

Yesterday at 15:15:10
Reply #26

Nejc Kilar

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
    • View Profile
    • My personal website
Hmm, so maybe I'm doing something wrong but here's the procedure:

- Create an ICC profile (via calibration etc)
- Load the ICC profile in Windows Color Management
- Start up 3ds Max, create a random color intense render and save a PNG file
- Open up Affinity (or PS), load up the saved render and make sure the ICC profile in Affinity / PS is set to the ICC
- Compare the VFB you have open with the file in Affinity / PS

So doing that I can see the Corona VFB matches the Affinity / PS document that is set to the ICC profile.

I've also tried live switching between the default sRGB Windows profile and the ICC I created and that also shows the difference as I switch between them.

Since I'm not touching any of the OCIO tools in any of the apps, could it be a Windows update that enabled this? :)
Nejc Kilar | chaos-corona.com
Educational Content Creator | contact us