Having trouble verifying your license? If you are seeing a license verification message or are unable to access your Chaos products, please follow these simple steps to fix sign-in issues. If you have already tried this and are still unable to access your Chaos products, please contact Support.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Since "color space" identifies a particular combination of the color model and the mapping function, the word is often used informally to identify a color model. However, even though identifying a color space automatically identifies the associated color model, this usage is incorrect in a strict sense. For example, although several specific color spaces are based on the RGB color model, there is no such thing as the singular RGB color space.(source: wiki)
Going back to the original topic, I spoke with someone from Blackmagic’s customer support, and he admitted the problem. He also noticed the difference in colors and contrast between the Color and Fusion pages on the Mac version.
Disclaimer: I'm no photography pro and I far from have a deep technical understanding of it but ...Basics of HDR?
Surely you want your exposure to remain in the stack at a bare minimum. Just like if taking a photo but plan on editing it in raw, you still expose the photo first and that's your starting point right?
It's something that always confuses me haha. Especially that AcesOT +1 stop of exposure thing.
I'd love someone to point me in the direction of a tutorial where someone takes a linear render and tonemaps it in Fusion/Resolve (ideally Fusion) and gets it back looking similar to how it did in the Frame Buffer before disabling the stack.
The way I see it, if editing the linear untonemapped image is akin to editing a raw photo, then the frame buffer is akin to the screen on the back of your camera. Its giving you a preview of the tonemapped raw render/photo. You then take that render/photo into your editor of choice (fusion/lightroom etc) and tonemap it using the flexibility of the tools in that editor. But my point is - your raw photo still relies on the exposure you set when taking the photo right? I appreciate the idea of RAW is that you can alter whatever you want after the fact, but you still want as close to a correctly exposed starting point as possible right?
What am I missing? I want to be educated .... hit me with it
