Author Topic: setting render corona engine  (Read 3841 times)

2014-10-23, 17:52:24

BODONG

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
How to create a default rendering for fast and produce a clean and sharp images

2014-10-23, 18:00:03
Reply #1

NielsH

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Press render and wait?

Your question is kind of vague but if you want to know good render settings to get started then the default ones are really good already and there isn't any reason to really tweak them unless you are trying to achieve something specific.

2014-10-23, 18:53:48
Reply #2

racoonart

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1446
    • View Profile
    • racoon-artworks
That's what defaults are made for. Best time/quality in most scenes.
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.

2014-10-26, 02:10:50
Reply #3

BODONG

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Press render and wait?

Your question is kind of vague but if you want to know good render settings to get started then the default ones are really good already and there isn't any reason to really tweak them unless you are trying to achieve something specific.

Thanks nielsh
frankly the same old feel when using the corona. I could take 10 hours to produce a clean and sharp images with a resolution of 3000 x 2500.
While the vray it took me 1 hour ... ... ... but I like corona. because it is very easy in most settings corana camera and lights, the problem I am too long in the end result.

2014-10-26, 02:18:39
Reply #4

BODONG

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
That's what defaults are made for. Best time/quality in most scenes.

Thanks  deadclown
What is my computer's machine capability that does not suport with corona. ... but if not suport, why I used vray can penetrate time 1-2 hours to achieve a resolution of 3000 x 2500 that is clean and sharp. This makes me, the time difference was puzzled as too far away.

2014-10-26, 02:38:40
Reply #5

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Well, I use both Vray3 and Corona (80perc. of time Corona only though). In both, on average i7 (I have farm though, so just for relevance) my pictures do take 10+ hours to render :- ).

With Vray you can optimalize a lot, cut paths to 4-6 bounces, Heavily biased cache (-3/-2 or -3/-1 Irradiance, thus solving GI only in 1/4 or 1/8 of final image resolution both in interpolated quality),
something that's not currently possible within Corona.

But once you compare similar visual quality (BF/LC) you will see a quite decent speedup, one that's even more noticeable in heavy GI scenes lit with IBL, where Corona is quite much faster.

But if you compare default Corona, to whatever potato setup you had, it will be slow I guess. This is the problem with people claiming Corona to be super fast, it's not. For some it's fast, for some it's slow...
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!