Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene

[JG_monomiru]

Dell T7600 with 2 octacore Xeon @ 3.1 Ghz

[gassboard]

Hi everyone. This is my first post.
Nice render engine, the render looks a little noisy but still pretty good.
Have a nice day!

PD: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz 32gb Ram

TIME: 0:03:25

[roman78]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz @3.56GHz
Time: 0:13:15, Rays/s: 1,597,378

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz @4.5GHz
Time: 0:4:11, Rays/s: 5,054,766

[Sovcat]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz
Time: 0:7:42, Rays/s: 2,752,237

Corona shows the CPU default clock, but it's overclocked to 4.2Ghz.

[j2cervin]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5680 @ 3.33GHz  (dual proc)
Time: 0:3:2, Rays/s: 6,977,686

[EarthMover]

Sager 9570 Laptop - 32 GB ram - 6 core

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz
Time: 0:4:47, Rays/s: 4,419,944

A tad slower than the other 3930K speeds posted but not bad for a portable rig.

(Time in the image is from my first run before closing Max and Photoshop.  Shaved 10 seconds by freeing up some CPU.  Might run again after a reboot)

[comrade.qweqwe]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4670K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Time: 0:7:57, Rays/s: 2,660,672

[choocha]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.80GHz (32Gb @ 1866 ram, Win 7x64)
Time: 0:2:57, Rays/s: 7,152,980

[Sovcat]

I'd like to post an update for mine. My Hyperthreading was disabled for my 4.2ghz overclock, but with a recent upgrade to watercooling I enabled it, and it shaved 3 minutes of the benchmark!

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (actually 4.2)
Time: 0:5:6, Rays/s: 4,152,109

[seraleklee1]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz  dualCPU
Time: 0:4:53, Rays/s: 4,334,513

[Bzdashekzapadlovski]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz
Time: 0:7:57, Rays/s: 2,667,889

[Bzdashekzapadlovski]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz
Time: 0:11:3, Rays/s: 1,918,160

[BlessOd]

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 5GHz
Time: 0:4:9, Rays/s: 5,094,439

almost as 4770K@4.5

[Jann]

Could someone please update this to Alpha 5?
Seems like A4 on which this is based doesn't work correctly on dual Xeon systems.
With A4 base, it doesn't show the speed increase you get in real life comparing to a quad i7 system.

[michaltimko]

Bought new pc today. Did some OC. Currently running on 4,4ghz stable on 1,255vcore. Temps are around 65-70stable on Noctua NDH14.
Im quite satisfied. It performs +- same as 3930k on stock clock.

For comparison, my another pc with 2600k is doing 4:33 on 4,4ghz. Those new Haswells are great at stock clock in terms of power consumption/performance ratio but overclocking is meh.
As you can see, 2years old SB performs very well at relatively "low" clock. I can push it to 4,6 easily.

So for those, who have SB and wants to upgrade to Haswell - just decide. I think its not worth. Wait on new generation or go to 3930k if you want maximum performance. But note that 4770k can perform +- same at 4,4ghz as 3930k on stock clock BUT if you push 3930k higher, power consumption is around 500W which is insane.

For example, 4770k at 4,4 eats +180W at plug. 3930k eats same at stock speed but pushing it higher can raise your electricity bills. Especially with one or two powerful GPU in rack.

BTW. here is the result :

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Time: 0:4:14, Rays/s: 5,003,488