Author Topic: Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene  (Read 541562 times)

2014-11-01, 21:06:51
Reply #420

krimson

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Time: 0:3:1, Rays/s: 6,993,480

dual processor

2014-11-01, 21:19:07
Reply #421

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Time: 0:3:1, Rays/s: 6,993,480

dual processor

Ok, not bad at all. You can effectively double that since this benchmark doesn't scale correctly. So pretty much double the performance as 5960X at stock+turbo.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2014-11-02, 09:37:41
Reply #422

apull

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Time: 0:3:1, Rays/s: 6,993,480

dual processor

What about real scene time render? 5960x(o.c.) vs dual e5-2640v3
« Last Edit: 2014-11-02, 14:35:12 by apull »

2014-11-02, 16:09:22
Reply #423

SHD

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
    • https://www.instagram.com/xshd/
i think need to do new  benchmark scene (for a7 for example)

2014-11-02, 16:24:03
Reply #424

romullus

  • Global Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 9333
  • Let's move this topic, shall we?
    • View Profile
    • My Models
i think need to do new  benchmark scene (for a7 for example)
Wouldn't it be a bit pointless, given the fact that A7 will stop working after 2014.12.31? Better choise would be scene for A6 or wait for V1.0.
I'm not Corona Team member. Everything i say, is my personal opinion only.
My Models | My Videos | My Pictures

2014-11-02, 17:03:34
Reply #425

SHD

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
    • https://www.instagram.com/xshd/
i think need to do new  benchmark scene (for a7 for example)
Wouldn't it be a bit pointless, given the fact that A7 will stop working after 2014.12.31? Better choise would be scene for A6 or wait for V1.0.

of course, it was  just for example ;)

2014-11-03, 02:21:56
Reply #426

krimson

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Quote
What about real scene time render? 5960x(o.c.) vs dual e5-2640v3

Here you go
5960 performs much better then dual xeon. (strange... am i doing something wrong here (maps and file comes from other computer through router... bottleneck?)
dual xeon performs better in mental ray
passmark scores and cinebench 15 where also better for dual xeon.


2014-11-03, 03:11:20
Reply #427

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Something is pretty wrong given that you have 1mil ray in your Xeon system and 2 mil in 5960X. All cores are rendering when you open task manager ?

I am using daily of A7.1 and my 2P Xeon 2680v2 gives me 3times the ray amount of of 4930k, so everything pretty correct there.

Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2014-11-03, 08:14:13
Reply #428

krimson

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Quote
Something is pretty wrong given that you have 1mil ray in your Xeon system and 2 mil in 5960X. All cores are rendering when you open task manager ?

Yes all 32 cores visible in taskmanager en running for 100%.

2014-11-03, 11:20:10
Reply #429

chopmeister

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
    • Polymachine
Finally found some time to test the new workstation, here's the results:


2014-11-03, 13:33:09
Reply #430

krimson

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
did another test dual 2640v3 vs 5960x (oc'd 4.3ghz), this time with maps on their own ssd.  this gave a better result for the dual xeon e5-2640v3:
dual xeon e5-2640v3:    3:29
i7-5960x (oc'd 4,3ghz):  4.:48

probably a bottleneck in my network...

2014-11-03, 13:35:06
Reply #431

krimson

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Quote
did another test dual 2640v3 vs 5960x (oc'd 4.3ghz), this time with maps on their own ssd.  this gave a better result for the dual xeon e5-2640v3:
dual xeon e5-2640v3:    3:29
i7-5960x (oc'd 4,3ghz):  4.:48


2014-11-03, 23:18:35
Reply #432

Gansalez

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz Ovc to 4.3 GHz
Time: 0:3:6, Rays/s: 6,816,742

2014-11-04, 12:17:25
Reply #433

Marvey

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
Hi, saw some asking for a benchmark with the new intel cpu i7-5960x

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
CPU: Intel(R) i7-5960x @3GHz
Graphic: Asus GTX780TI
Board: Asus Rampage Extreme V
Memory: 64gb Crucial DDR4
Time: 0:2:14

Not sure why you guys having so high times, my test i got 02:14 clocked at 4.4ghz for sure something not well configured in your system.

2014-11-07, 12:32:28
Reply #434

Kristoffer Andersen

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz
Time: 0:3:19, Rays/s: 6,373,772