@aleeriza I don't hink Keymaster is saying that what you say is bullshit, I think what he is saying is that this type of model is bullshit, and I agree with him, usually features are progressively developed and companies hide them until they have enough features to justify a release (lately they don't accumulate too much or good features... they are a bit shameless) and then charge your for a 2.0
IMHO the new model proposed here is better, there are still some things in the air like the proposed renewal price at a point release or the subs price for Box customers, that is a very interesting point.
I also agree that a few more render nodes could be great, or at least a way to adding render nodes in a cheap way.
Anyway, they've done their numbers, I think they are pretty fair and good pricing, even when I noted my opinion on it, it's a personal feeling, but it still is fair, and they have to maintain development to achieve more speed, more features, more quality, and the've proved to all of us that they are very capable of doing that, and they've proved also that they are a fair trade company, they don't want to turn gold on us, but live and create, and this pricing model does that I think.
I also think that the SaaS price is a bit high, but once again, they have numbers and they've made me trust them, so if those are the numbers they nee to maintain a continuous development in such quality, speed and customer relationship, i think it's fair.
Cheers.