Nature Living

[V.virtualview]

I know they often use 'Magnific' for that. But I achieved the same results with the Stable Diffusion inpaint model 'Realistic Vision'!
AI doesn’t necessarily make your image better—it should already be good beforehand.
Things like color composition also play a big role. AI just adds the final touch.

You can try Magnific—it definitely saves time, but it's very expensive!
That’s why it’s better to use Stable Diffusion with inpainting—just improve small 768x768 areas where needed, like plants or grass.
I’m not a Stable Diffusion expert either—there might be even more efficient approaches.

[dj_buckley]

Yep I'm already using SD but always looking for better workflows.  I think they key here is that the base render is already awesome

[V.virtualview]

@dj_buckley,

when you guys need more help or tips just write me on Instagram: v.virtualview :)

[Philip kelly]

Is it just the higher quality image is the difference, as that all i can see.
Its Sharper?
Thank you.
Phil

[romullus]

Is it just the higher quality image is the difference, as that all i can see.

For me the difference is very clear. Without AI the image looks good, but all the assets and materials, albeit high quality, but nonetheless have that CGI feeling, which is very hard to disguise by using traditional methods only. After AI treatment, the image looks much the same, except that now all the foliage and surfaces looks simply photo like. IMO that is exactly how AI should be used in archviz.

[V.virtualview]

Im not sure if I uploaded the picture without AI in the same resolution like the other pictures... You can see the difference in the leafs for example.

[Urbanjunky]

looks like AI just applied dehazing and sharpening effects. the base looks incredible on its own. i'd say this is 1% AI and 99% artist effort. good job!

[dj_buckley]

I know they often use 'Magnific' for that. But I achieved the same results with the Stable Diffusion inpaint model 'Realistic Vision'!
AI doesn’t necessarily make your image better—it should already be good beforehand.
Things like color composition also play a big role. AI just adds the final touch.

You can try Magnific—it definitely saves time, but it's very expensive!
That’s why it’s better to use Stable Diffusion with inpainting—just improve small 768x768 areas where needed, like plants or grass.
I’m not a Stable Diffusion expert either—there might be even more efficient approaches.

Out of interest, what resolution was the final render.  Also when using SD are you using the WebUI or a plugin directly inside of Photoshop?  Do you use any Control Nets or IPAdapters or Loras, or is this simply using a checkpoint and prompts?

[V.virtualview]

Hey, final Resolution is 5000px. Just the Standard Stable Diffusion nothing special:)

[dj_buckley]

Hey, final Resolution is 5000px. Just the Standard Stable Diffusion nothing special:)

So you rendered at 5000px or was that after an upscale?

[V.virtualview]

I render at 5000px