In 3ds Max, you shouldn't have two versions of full Max open at the same time (even if one is only rendering), as that would require 2 full Corona licenses - render nodes only work with non-full versions, that is 3ds Max or Cinema 4D in client mode (with Max, that's via Backburner or Corona DR, and with C4D, that's via Team Render).
sorry, I've described my intensions badly - what I ment was exactly the situation that sirio76 described in his post.
burnin - yep, I know that prime doesnt have team render included - thats why I'm asking my question - does corona require it to render through corona nodes ?
If not, working on prime version is completly unacceptable cause it doesnt have a possibility to render on corona nodes - u can use prime version only if :
1. you work only on small projects,
2. you dont work on many projects at one time
3. or you can just have one overkilled PC and you work only on it - the u could work on big projects, but still you can render just on one PC.
So using prime version becomes useless, and people that was hoping that they can change 3dsmax+corona to c4d prime+corona ( cause this is far more profitable solution ) have to be
disappointed as f*ck. And the other thing - render nodes, for many people, are like 30%-50% value of a renderer, if you want to be on a market today, render fast, work on many projects, some kind of DR solution is a must have.
Althought i understand implementing corona to c4d is hard work, we've been waiting for years, I for example lost hope some time ago when chaosgroup absorbed corona and I've stopped investing my time and money in c4d, and now when it comes out, when I see light in the tunnel, when I thinh, yeah f*ck you autodesk, f*ck your subscription - corona for c4d doesnt have working DR solution for prime.......f*ck. It should at least be cheaper for prime or something.