Author Topic: CPU performance discussion...  (Read 10899 times)

2018-02-23, 11:34:51
Reply #15

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
If you pay close to msrp for retail Xeons then yes, that's true. Otherwise it gets very close.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2018-02-23, 11:45:41
Reply #16

alexyork

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 739
  • Partner at Recent Spaces
    • View Profile
    • RECENT SPACES
If you pay close to msrp for retail Xeons then yes, that's true. Otherwise it gets very close.

Well we're talking the difference between around £3k for an i9-based system and £6k for a xeon-based system, trade prices.
Alex York
Partner
RECENT SPACES
recentspaces.com

2018-02-23, 11:54:47
Reply #17

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
I have been experimenting with AVX(and AVX-512 offset). And here is where I get confused:

1.) AVX instruction seriously do rise the load on CPU (tested) so the -5 (-500Mhz) offset largely advertised around stands, at least if you overclock rather high. (Even SiliconLottery settings for their best chip are 4.5 non-AVX, 4 AVX).
2.) Corona kicks in AVX offset, but.. from what I've understood these aren't deliberately used instructions (and the benchmark doesn't even have them for example).
3.) That would lead me to thinking that I can actually disregard AVX offset if I am going to ONLY use Corona in large multithreaded way. Because what else is there ? Everything else hardly uses the CPU for more than few seconds. Of course if I would forget and start Vray I would shut-down the PC :- ).

But the actual result is that Corona's load still resembles the AVX... it requires voltage somewhere mid-way between AVX and non-AVX. So does Corona 1.7 actually use the AVX-512 deliberately now perhaps ?

Now I am very curious and I think I will build also a Threadripper next week and compare how they actually do when AVX is fully accounted to. The benchmarks sucks in comparison, obviously, i9 runs high but with AVX offset when it will come to actual 1.7 use, the difference might not be that much.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2018-02-23, 11:56:22
Reply #18

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
If you pay close to msrp for retail Xeons then yes, that's true. Otherwise it gets very close.

Well we're talking the difference between around £3k for an i9-based system and £6k for a xeon-based system, trade prices.

Paying for Retail Xeons was the largest mistake of my life 5 years ago :- ). Do go for the i9 in this case then.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2018-02-23, 16:22:17
Reply #19

nikoLAB

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
@Juraj

Please, write about specification and impressions when you test Threadripper.

2018-03-15, 11:07:44
Reply #20

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
I have been experimenting with AVX(and AVX-512 offset). And here is where I get confused:

1.) AVX instruction seriously do rise the load on CPU (tested) so the -5 (-500Mhz) offset largely advertised around stands, at least if you overclock rather high. (Even SiliconLottery settings for their best chip are 4.5 non-AVX, 4 AVX).
2.) Corona kicks in AVX offset, but.. from what I've understood these aren't deliberately used instructions (and the benchmark doesn't even have them for example).
3.) That would lead me to thinking that I can actually disregard AVX offset if I am going to ONLY use Corona in large multithreaded way. Because what else is there ? Everything else hardly uses the CPU for more than few seconds. Of course if I would forget and start Vray I would shut-down the PC :- ).

But the actual result is that Corona's load still resembles the AVX... it requires voltage somewhere mid-way between AVX and non-AVX. So does Corona 1.7 actually use the AVX-512 deliberately now perhaps ?

Now I am very curious and I think I will build also a Threadripper next week and compare how they actually do when AVX is fully accounted to. The benchmarks sucks in comparison, obviously, i9 runs high but with AVX offset when it will come to actual 1.7 use, the difference might not be that much.
no, we have no AVX512 (AFAIK not even embree supports it for desktop CPUs)
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2018-03-16, 04:46:40
Reply #21

danio1011

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 385
    • View Profile
Did you ever build a 1950x system, Juraj?  Just curious as to your impressions.

2018-03-16, 09:17:20
Reply #22

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Not yet :- )
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2018-03-16, 09:55:34
Reply #23

3dboomerang

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 215
  • Head of 3D
    • View Profile
    • 3DFLOW
nothing wrong with the threadripper - 1950x - as far as i can see.

I'm operating @ 3,5Ghz though, not at the boosted 4Ghz since the PSU is bugging up on me - there's a kernel problem going on, which I think, is MOBO-PSU related, not CPU by itself.. But comp freezes when going over 3,5Ghz. I'm still trying to figure it out tbh. Also 2 memory slots don't work on the MOBO lol so there's something stinky going on.

But all stable @ 3,5Ghz.

MEM: 48Gb
GPU: GEFORCE 1050Ti
CPU: THREADRIPPER x1950
PSU: CORSAIR 550
MOBO: ASUS PRIME X399-A

total price: 2800€ - 3400€ (belgium) - parts ordered from all over europe for cheapest prices (I dont recommend doing this btw)

cinebench: see attahced

if any questions - shoot.

2018-03-16, 15:29:56
Reply #24

Sulphurous

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 24
  • fdsf
    • View Profile
Will GPU bottlenecks have an impact on rendering times? i7-4770k here with an MSI Radeon R9 280X Gaming Edition 3GB GPU
Tutka Tutkowicz Tupolew

2018-03-16, 15:57:33
Reply #25

TomG

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 6102
    • View Profile
Will GPU bottlenecks have an impact on rendering times? i7-4770k here with an MSI Radeon R9 280X Gaming Edition 3GB GPU

Not rendering with Corona, it's CPU only and doesn't use the GPU at all.
Tom Grimes | chaos-corona.com
Product Manager | contact us