Author Topic: What is correct?  (Read 3530 times)

2017-06-18, 20:40:55

Marian

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
Hello? Could you tell me please, which picture (behaviour) is correct (which approach use in general)? First cube is one poly per side, second 10 polys per side. There is difference in reflectance. Thx

2017-06-18, 22:57:09
Reply #1

romullus

  • Global Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 9251
  • Let's move this topic, shall we?
    • View Profile
    • My Models
I'm not Corona Team member. Everything i say, is my personal opinion only.
My Models | My Videos | My Pictures

2017-06-18, 23:21:43
Reply #2

Marian

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
Thanks. Both cubes have bevelled edges. See renders. Only difference is count of polys on faces <not edges>. Or I misunderstood your hint? Btw I'm C4D user. I guess it's doesn't matter.

2017-06-19, 09:16:13
Reply #3

lacilaci

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 749
    • View Profile
Thanks. Both cubes have bevelled edges. See renders. Only difference is count of polys on faces <not edges>. Or I misunderstood your hint? Btw I'm C4D user. I guess it's doesn't matter.

Don't know how it works in c4d but you need to break up the smoothing if you want to have the sides of the cube appear flat. In max you could make sides of the cube be one smoothing group and the bevels would be another. This way there would not be a smooth transition of lighting.

The reason you see a difference based on the ammount of polys in the bevel is probably due to more polygons easily reach the default angle tolerance needed for auto smoothing. (not sure what are the defaults in c4d)

2017-06-19, 11:01:45
Reply #4

BatRM

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
In C4D you can change this by playing with the options in the "phong tag" attached to your object

2017-06-19, 14:05:22
Reply #5

Marian

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
Thanks for reply. Yes, it is relate to phong tag. On pics is comparison. First is simple poly with break edges which are connected with face, second multi poly with same break p.tag, third is multi poly with no break p. tag, fourth - break edges which are connected with face.