Author Topic: Would this be considered good light ?  (Read 2625 times)

2017-04-05, 18:08:24

Jadefox

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 251
    • View Profile
    • Renderlab
Take note :
• Ignore the background for now that is the HDRi I use
• Ignore floating building still a WIP


2017-04-05, 19:01:06
Reply #1

STRAT

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
    • sjleworthy.com
'Good light' is all relative.

You're stage of image is way too early to call it either good or bad light.  Way too early.  As it stands, it's very very standard light for this stage.  As it stands, your light is super strong and contrasty.  This will obviously change as the scene/materials develop. One gets the impression 3d archi rendering is brand new to you.  Dont worry, keep on going and ask questions later :)

2017-04-05, 20:13:13
Reply #2

Nejc Kilar

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 1334
    • View Profile
    • My personal website
What STRAT said :) That and I'd suggest maybe softening the shadows a little bit to create blurrier shadow lines. Unless you wanted them as sharp, of course :)
Nejc Kilar | chaos-corona.com
Educational Content Creator | contact us

2017-04-05, 21:52:16
Reply #3

Jadefox

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 251
    • View Profile
    • Renderlab
Hi Guys

Thanks for the feedback
Just one problem for me, what is the systematic approach ?
It seems from STRAT that it is a continuously adjusted process of changing the light

From what I understand from some research is that most people would apply corona MAT
to the whole scene and from there they would adjust the light and that would be it for light
and from what I gather from you guys, is that as soon as I add material I would re-adjust the
light again ?