Author Topic: jg first test  (Read 6229 times)

2013-06-29, 20:30:51

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
i just recently discovered corona - thanks to lasse - quite a nice render engine with some potentials. did my first test today with an simple scene made in vray. I used the material and light converter script from the forum and hit render.

I'm quite satisfied with the result for no effort. Hope to find time exploring the engine and the settings in depth.


2013-06-29, 20:36:04
Reply #1

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4815
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Seems very slow for such powerful CPU, 2678 is more powerful than 3930k (which achieves over 5mil/s rays). Can you run the benchmark which is on this forum ?
What settings did you run this on ? Default PT+PT ?
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2013-06-29, 20:46:14
Reply #2

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
i did the hd cache, but everything else is default.


2013-06-29, 21:06:58
Reply #3

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
Did the benchmark and also the comparision to the vray rendering.

i guess i need to work on the render settings in corona... i guess then it will be faster. benchmakr was promising.

2013-06-29, 21:47:55
Reply #4

yagi

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 372
    • View Profile
How come?........2 hours VS 13 minutes ???......speechless difference considering d benchmark performance. Is this alpha V5

2013-06-29, 21:53:16
Reply #5

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
yeah its the alpha5 and set to hd cache...

i dunno after running the benchmark i couldnt start a corona rendering in max. might reinstall corona again.

2013-06-29, 21:56:07
Reply #6

Polymax

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 830
  • CG Generalist
    • View Profile
    • maxkagirov.com
Can you post the scene (corona)? I'll try to set it up.
Corona - the best rendering solution!

2013-06-29, 22:00:25
Reply #7

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
it is an currently ongoing project, so i can't post you the scene.

but thank you.

2013-06-29, 22:25:09
Reply #8

racoonart

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1446
    • View Profile
    • racoon-artworks
1): you won't have a valid comparison unless you use Bf+LC in Vray and Pt+HDCache in Corona, but that just as a sidenote ;)
2): The converter script will not make "good" materials. You still have to make sure that your window glass is set to thin or hybrid mode (depends if it's just a polygon or a box with thickness). That can make a huge impact.
3): You can try to use portals unless you would need lots of them. Keymaster told me that there is a usable limit until those portals will work with embree acceleration.
« Last Edit: 2013-06-29, 22:33:06 by DeadClown »
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.

2013-06-29, 22:32:27
Reply #9

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
thanks.... i'll look into that.

just figured, that there is a big discrepancy between Ray/s in benchmark and when rendering from within 3dsmax
 benchmark i got nearly 6million rays/s while when using hd-cache or pathtracing in 3dsmax its around 1.2 million

2013-06-29, 23:01:23
Reply #10

JG_monomiru

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 149
  • JG
    • View Profile
    • www.gehrcken.de
ok, figured it depends on complexity of the scene. simple cornelbox is around 36million ray/s.

so i better look deeper into the whole engine before posting more stuff. but as i said its promising for a first try