1
[Max] Daily Builds / Re: Chaos Corona 13 for 3ds Max - Daily Builds Discussion
« on: 2025-06-12, 08:46:56 »
Thanks! I hope this can be resolved before the official release.
2025-06-15, 20:16:42
News:
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
[Max] Daily Builds / Re: Chaos Corona 13 for 3ds Max - Daily Builds Discussion
« on: 2025-06-11, 21:02:41 »
I've noticed some strange behavior in CoronaSky Volume Effect. The Volume Effect creates some sort of volumetric cone when the scene is viewed from above. Is there a logic behind this or is it a bug?
3
Gallery / Re: Kaizen Karkonosze
« on: 2025-02-27, 08:24:15 »
Thank You for the answer.
Once again - congratulations - very nice work!
Once again - congratulations - very nice work!
4
Gallery / Re: Kaizen Karkonosze
« on: 2025-02-21, 09:10:56 »
Very nice work!
How did You get such realistic snow effect?
How did You get such realistic snow effect?
5
Gallery / Re: Natural landscape in analog photo style
« on: 2025-01-27, 11:47:02 »
How on earth did You manage to spot chromatic aberrations on old b&w pictures?
To my taste, these renderings are very far from the retro vibes - too perfectly balanced between white and black, there is no over/under exposure which was vastly present in photography.
To my taste, these renderings are very far from the retro vibes - too perfectly balanced between white and black, there is no over/under exposure which was vastly present in photography.
6
[Max] Feature Requests / Re: The most wanted feature?
« on: 2024-07-29, 16:08:31 »
The poll should be updated, some of the points have beed delivered.
7
Gallery / Re: Walking down the factory street.
« on: 2024-03-01, 13:40:08 »
What is happening to the trees? :)
8
Gallery / Re: Raw Izba
« on: 2023-12-13, 10:13:01 »
Very nice mood. So nice it made me overcome my reluctance and write some constructive comments.
The old parts of the building are well done and convincing - truss and beams, boarding, floor (some nice wood replacements), walls (brick with exposed pre-painting and raw clay), perhaps windows are too damaged- one can spend a fortune to heat the space.
The scene would benefit from more messy look, now it's super-sterile and without any signs of life. Who lives there?
Also the fireplace needs some love - not usable in real-life scenario (think about all the mess on the floor while cleaning) and visually kinda fake - no ash, no carbon stains on the glass, flames are schematic. The stone cladding of the fireplace is also somewhat weird. Maybe it's the direction of light but I cannot resist the feeling that there is something wrong with the displacement (when viewed from the sofa side).
The old parts of the building are well done and convincing - truss and beams, boarding, floor (some nice wood replacements), walls (brick with exposed pre-painting and raw clay), perhaps windows are too damaged- one can spend a fortune to heat the space.
The scene would benefit from more messy look, now it's super-sterile and without any signs of life. Who lives there?
Also the fireplace needs some love - not usable in real-life scenario (think about all the mess on the floor while cleaning) and visually kinda fake - no ash, no carbon stains on the glass, flames are schematic. The stone cladding of the fireplace is also somewhat weird. Maybe it's the direction of light but I cannot resist the feeling that there is something wrong with the displacement (when viewed from the sofa side).
9
Gallery / Re: Our brush dropped on this colorless world
« on: 2023-10-16, 15:53:10 »
Renderings are ok-ish. Some textures are too low-res.
BUT
Design-wise it is awful.
I would go nuts having to re-set the flower every time opening and closing the fridge.
The floor is a nightmare to clean...
BUT
Design-wise it is awful.
I would go nuts having to re-set the flower every time opening and closing the fridge.
The floor is a nightmare to clean...
10
Gallery / Re: Complete Residential Building
« on: 2023-02-10, 15:18:25 »
Excellent execution! Well done.
11
[Max] General Discussion / Re: cosmos browser difference corona vs vray
« on: 2023-01-04, 09:46:36 »
Thank You for the explanation, Rowan.
12
[Max] General Discussion / Re: cosmos browser difference corona vs vray
« on: 2023-01-03, 21:21:14 »
Sure.
But still this is beyond my comprehension - how external program, which Chaos Browser obviously is, cannot at least download some decals textures. It can download other textures, floors, walls, whatever, but not decals... I'm dissapointed with this situation, as well as with the changes to the licence. Not to mention the price increase.
I'm with Corona since non-commercial version but seems like this year will be the last. Too much "chaos" for me.
But still this is beyond my comprehension - how external program, which Chaos Browser obviously is, cannot at least download some decals textures. It can download other textures, floors, walls, whatever, but not decals... I'm dissapointed with this situation, as well as with the changes to the licence. Not to mention the price increase.
I'm with Corona since non-commercial version but seems like this year will be the last. Too much "chaos" for me.
13
[Max] General Discussion / Re: cosmos browser difference corona vs vray
« on: 2023-01-03, 16:30:19 »
I'm using last version available for 3ds max 2015, which means version 8, where decals were introduced. It is hard to believe that a bunch of simple bitmaps cannot be accessed via Cosmos Browser - which also was introduced in version 8, along with decals... This is a total nonsense. Where can I apply for the partial refund due to limited functionality of Cosmos?
14
[Max] General Discussion / Re: cosmos browser difference corona vs vray
« on: 2022-12-29, 18:18:01 »
Thanks Maru. It is extremely frustrating...
15
[Max] General Discussion / Re: cosmos browser difference corona vs vray
« on: 2022-12-29, 16:26:52 »
Just curious, Maru. How many assets do you have in your Cosmos Browser accessed via 3ds max / Corona?