Messages

1

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Vray Next vs Corona 4

« on: 2019-05-09, 11:56:17 »

Reflect on backside was on (I always toggle this to evaluate results with glass).

You also need fog to be active to be able to get (total) internal reflections.

I would also imagine that Grant would be aware of those settings, too, when making his comments that so closely aligned with our impressions

I wouldn't assume.
What you describe in the above is pretty much the definition of "confirmation bias".

2

[Max] I need help! / Re: Vrscans

« on: 2017-08-28, 13:54:33 »

How did you manage to get those from Chaosgroup?
They're kept 100 meters underground in an atomic bunker!

Oh wait... ^^

p.s.:I too should say hi, Ondra!

3

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Render Legion and Corona Join Forces with Chaos Group

« on: 2017-08-27, 13:40:59 »

Lele posted on the chaosg forum: "Want things quick, Corona, want to go deeper, V-Ray.", that would be a reality..... so much for making rendering fun again :c

I believe it's all well cleared now (and will be clearer in the future), but my writing could indeed have been a bit more accurate, sorry for that.
But the point stands: if no one in the Corona user pool needs deep EXRs (i am making a thought experiment here, it may or may not reflect reality.), why should Corona implement them and inevitably increase clutter?
On the other hand, should the feature be requested, well, it so happens the one for V-Ray is production-proven (as it was production-requested!) a few times over, and it could perhaps be ported if needed, which is overall much cheaper on resources than for the RL team to go through all the coding phases anew (A.K.A. re-inventing the wheel.).

I hope I was clearer this time around, sorry again for the poor wording.