But let's say a speech could be designed for an audience so the choice of words and topic would be audience-targeted
Very true, careful preparation and certain internalized pretentiousness can go long way in fooling not only computers, but people alike. Otherwise, alibistic bullshiters wouldn't be so popular.
It's also why it suggests personal writing (doesn't men self-centered (takes away the pretentiousness) and longer (the longer you have to speak/write, the less will you preparation last and you will speak more naturally, creating certain consistence).|
If you would let Donald Trump speak for 24 hours straight, even his most derailed supporters would come to realization he is utmost imbecile. Or not :/
But results are more reliable about the stuff like "He's prone to buy eco friendly: target for an ecover ad".... like a tool looking for new potential clients.
I actually think this is the weakest part of the tool, I think they should have skimmed it since it seem least developed. Look like they only created few of those roles and simple correlation with few of those stats.
But by all means, it is of course arbitrary and flawed on many occasions, this isn't application that was developed by solidly large science team for eternity.
To get the most out of it, you have to go with the flow and take it for what it is :- ).
« Last Edit: 2016-01-18, 21:28:34 by Juraj_Talcik »
Logged
Please follow my new
Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!