1
[Max] Resolved Feature Requests / Re: Nvidia real-time raytracing
« on: 2018-08-16, 16:28:10 »
Just want to second this. Might be time to start considering making Corona GPU?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You can do by yourself!
I'm my original thread, you can download the FStom .max file and the Corona .max file.
--- LINK---
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i7C0g1XqRMN1lodFNUb1d5REk
I'm not FStom user, sorry. I used the FStom DEMO version, one year ago.
If you will do the test, please, post the result ;-)
For a serious comparative, you should use the same light setup. Also, don't use any converter, but convert by hand with the better setup.
If you want to try, this is my old test, converted by me, from FStorm file to Corona 1.3 (yes, I should try with the new Coroa v1.7) .
--- LINK---
If you look the 18 minutes FStorm test (Titan X + GTX980Ti) and my test with very old 7 970 six core, (15 minutes) Corona wins.
Why? Because with less rendering time and with very old CPU I have more or less the same quality or, even, better quality than an expensive dual GPU rendering.
Of course, we should try with the new version of Fstorm and Corona v1.7. Also the Fstorm original rendering ( I found it in the FStorm forum) was in JPG and not in PNG.
But, I'm very curious to see a test with two rig with the same price. For example, a new 700 GPU with new 700 CPUm with the last version of both softwares.
PS: remember that in Corona v1.3 there weren't any bloom or glare.
Guys, please stop the wave of hate, stay calm, and take a look at https://corona-renderer.com/blog/new-horizons-plans-for-2017-and-beyond/
Probably not shut down, but cripple, take all the goods and raise price, apsolutely! Many studio use Corona with alot of subscriptions, this is definetly changing it. Very bad move guys.