Corona Renderer Forum

General Category => Gallery => Topic started by: indrazulfi on 2013-12-06, 09:13:24

Title: Corona Test #4
Post by: indrazulfi on 2013-12-06, 09:13:24
At the end of this week I tried again this rendering engine ..
and I keep saying, I love it .....

I tried MSI with a value of 0.
I also tried DOF

I say again, Corona is extraordinary!

I have a visualization studio here, Surabaya, Indonesia
and I plan to make a mini-workshop to introduce this powerfull render engine.

This does allow for me to do?

after I tried to tell this idea to some of my friends in the field of visualization they are very interested in trying this rendering engine.

I hope this month's mini workshop can run this plan. and later I will attach pictures of the workshop here if possible ..

Cheers.
Indra

(http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3706/11233236124_0405086715_z.jpg)

(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5534/11233332583_8d765aa139_z.jpg)

(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2852/11233195165_406bea981f_z.jpg)

(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7395/11233152035_2b2bcb5af6_z.jpg)
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: lome3d on 2013-12-08, 05:20:06
i love the first and second rendering. Its nice. I heard that MSI 400 is the best . Did you know it?
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: ondrike on 2013-12-08, 18:23:19
i love the first and second rendering. Its nice. I heard that MSI 400 is the best . Did you know it?

MSI=0 is unbiased solution, but it takes more time to render clean picture without noise.

Btw, nice pics :)
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: indrazulfi on 2013-12-09, 14:24:03
I'm use 0 for MSI .. ;)
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: RolandB on 2013-12-09, 14:41:18
Hi Indra
And congrats for those clean images.
I tried MSI 0 this morning, after reading this post, but the quality is not immediately as good as 100 for example. You have to wait more time, is it your case... so what about the rendering time of your images ?
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: indrazulfi on 2013-12-09, 15:39:01
Hi Indra
And congrats for those clean images.
I tried MSI 0 this morning, after reading this post, but the quality is not immediately as good as 100 for example. You have to wait more time, is it your case... so what about the rendering time of your images ?

Hi RolandB ..

On this scene i just render using PT+HD .. with PT Samples 16 and MSI 0 . it took 3 hours for bit cleaning image..
i think it's because i using not supported SS4 Processor .. But i tHink it's seems fast! :)

in Fact .. I'm trying save the render image using PNG 16Bit is Noise like a VFB Image.. But when i use Save to EXR and open image to Photoshop .. it's more reduce Noise .. :)

Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: Stanislav_But on 2013-12-09, 22:35:44
On this scene i just render using PT+HD .. with PT Samples 16 and MSI 0 . it took 3 hours for bit cleaning image..
i think it's because i using not supported SS4 Processor .. But i tHink it's seems fast! :)

in Fact .. I'm trying save the render image using PNG 16Bit is Noise like a VFB Image.. But when i use Save to EXR and open image to Photoshop .. it's more reduce Noise .. :)

Good! With MSI 0... Very good! And clean
About EXR vs. VFB - i also saw such difference in pictures
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: indrazulfi on 2013-12-10, 06:13:31
Yeapp .. it's good trick (EXR) ;)
Title: Re: Corona Test #4
Post by: jonofj on 2013-12-11, 21:54:21
cool images