Chaos Corona Forum

Chaos Corona for 3ds Max => [Max] General Discussion => Topic started by: ciarand on 2015-02-04, 11:55:08

Title: Surprising Comparison
Post by: ciarand on 2015-02-04, 11:55:08
Hey folks!

First off, thanks to the team for such an awesome render engine! Amazingly simple and beautiful results.

I was looking at building a machine that would run Corona and assumed that being a CPU renderer that more CPUs would obviously be better. However in practice what I found was that my 5 year old home system with an i7 920 with 6GB ram or something like that, rendered a simple product viz style scene (basic tv, with glossy materials on a reflective glossy floor and 3 corona area lights) slightly faster than my work system, which is a dual Xeon E5 2643 and 12GB ram.

Is it just that on such a simple scene that the extra power awarded by the Xeon's is not noticeable? Would I notice a much bigger difference on an interior scene that relied on indirect lighting more?

I just thought it was odd, and was quite disappointed to not see my render time halved!
Title: Re: Surprising Comparison
Post by: arqrenderz on 2015-02-04, 13:36:32
It shouldn't be that way, re check with another scene.
The frecuency and core count  is higher on the xeons you use maybe some problem here?