Chaos Corona Forum

General Category => Gallery => Topic started by: Grafikus on 2014-04-21, 15:56:12

Title: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-21, 15:56:12: this existing architecture )
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: gabrielefx on 2014-04-21, 19:13:31: very good!

some trees are too high for me...
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: bouhmidage on 2014-04-21, 23:07:07: very nice work !! do you use plan light to light the interior of the bulding ??
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-22, 01:01:38: Quote from: bouhmidage on 2014-04-21, 23:07:07
very nice work !! do you use plan light to light the interior of the bulding ??
Thank you ). No , i am not used the plan light, there is corona sphere lighting.
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Chakib on 2014-04-22, 01:21:27: Excellent work !
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-22, 07:41:03: Quote from: Chakib on 2014-04-22, 01:21:27
Excellent work !
Thanks.
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: matoha on 2014-04-22, 10:15:10: m8. in *45.jpg the dof is a bit too over the edge like if it was a 1meter model shot in macro
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: HLeandre on 2014-04-22, 11:38:58: Pretty cool !
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-22, 23:55:48: Quote from: matoha on 2014-04-22, 10:15:10
m8. in *45.jpg the dof is a bit too over the edge like if it was a 1meter model shot in macro
I do not understand you very well since I have a bad English )))
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Utroll on 2014-04-23, 00:10:24: he's saying exactly what I wanted to write down :

- too much blur on one closer view (***45.jpg), it looks like macro photo, not big building.

As background is rendered it's not even a tricky composition post work.
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: romullus on 2014-04-23, 00:26:25: Yeah, it looks double confusing, because reflection, seen on building, is in perfect focus, whereas it shoudn't be, given the fact that background is so out of focus. But of course, it's impossible to overcome this issue in post.
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-23, 00:30:03: Quote from: Utroll on 2014-04-23, 00:10:24
he's saying exactly what I wanted to write down :

- too much blur on one closer view (***45.jpg), it looks like macro photo, not big building.

As background is rendered it's not even a tricky composition post work.
aah now I understand, may be it looks because I did it in photoshop, and I have not modified the landscape, so we had so much to blur, and then you saw my not to landscape when done
hope you understand me )
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Juraj on 2014-04-23, 00:30:53: Could look really quite real...but the 3D people have to go. They literally ruin it. Otherwise good job ! I would correct the green levels of trees a bit down. Either keep the saturation between sky and nature consistent, or tone down the nature.
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-23, 00:33:31: Quote from: romullus on 2014-04-23, 00:26:25
Yeah, it looks double confusing, because reflection, seen on building, is in perfect focus, whereas it shoudn't be, given the fact that background is so out of focus. But of course, it's impossible to overcome this issue in post.

Yes you are right, in postprocessing must be good for working
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Sam75 on 2014-04-26, 00:05:19: What building is it, do you know the architect ?
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Grafikus on 2014-04-26, 00:43:39: Quote from: Sam75 on 2014-04-26, 00:05:19
What building is it, do you know the architect ?
it is build Levent Loft II is in Stambul, architect and I do not know
Title: Re: architecture
Post by: Sam75 on 2014-04-26, 02:03:36: Quote from: Grafikus on 2014-04-26, 00:43:39
Quote from: Sam75 on 2014-04-26, 00:05:19
What building is it, do you know the architect ?
it is build Levent Loft II is in Stambul, architect and I do not know

thanks