Chaos Corona Forum

General Category => Gallery => Topic started by: Denis Guchev on 2020-06-01, 11:16:02

Title: Northern Shelter
Post by: Denis Guchev on 2020-06-01, 11:16:02
Software: 3dsmax, Adobe Photoshop, Speedtree, World Machine, Quixel megascans
Behance: https://www.behance.net/gallery/98094001/Northern-shelter
Title: Re: Northern Shelter
Post by: maru on 2020-06-01, 15:29:23
Woah, this is an explosion of color and texture. A nice change from the usual toned and desaturated archviz!
Title: Re: Northern Shelter
Post by: razvanux on 2020-06-01, 19:40:52
To many details in the same image. If you use so many details in the close up don't use also cumulus clouds in the back . They for  form outside of main land. In this case on the seaside .
Sometime : Less is more.
The images could be great if had different clouds in back .
Title: Re: Northern Shelter
Post by: mase on 2020-06-02, 18:17:30
To many details in the same image. If you use so many details in the close up don't use also cumulus clouds in the back . They for  form outside of main land. In this case on the seaside .
Sometime : Less is more.
The images could be great if had different clouds in back .

I completely disagree with you here.

It is clear that the artist didn't go for a traditional 3 plane composition here with blurred foreground and background, but instead chose to portray the architecture and the landscape in all of it's glory. With that in mind, I believe that having a dramatic sky and lots of details in both textures, entourage and key objects of the image makes it visually and conceptually interesting and contributes to the overall story. While quite often having this many dominant colors and/or textures in an image can result in imbalance, I would say that this time they do play together really well.

Great job on matte painting the image! I always love a little bit of a side-story in architectural visualizations :)
Title: Re: Northern Shelter
Post by: agentdark45 on 2020-06-03, 16:21:34
To many details in the same image. If you use so many details in the close up don't use also cumulus clouds in the back . They for  form outside of main land. In this case on the seaside .
Sometime : Less is more.
The images could be great if had different clouds in back .

I disagree, I think the issue is just a slight lack of distance haze/fog as the mountains are looking a bit too super sharp as if the air is particulate free.
Title: Re: Northern Shelter
Post by: razvanux on 2020-06-07, 01:47:15
If you have to many things in  the background you lose the focus on the building. If the focus is not on your house then it looks perfect. The night view looks perfect because the focus stay's on the  house .