Chaos Corona Forum

General Category => General CG Discussion => Hardware => Topic started by: Fritzlachatte on 2017-07-23, 09:51:19

Title: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Fritzlachatte on 2017-07-23, 09:51:19
Hi,

more and more there come new informations or keep repeating about AMD Threadripper and Epyc aka Naples.
The prices appear in the anticipated range, but what I was wondering (or not, really) how expensice the Threadripper Mainboard might be.
( wccftech:"We are hearing prices close to ASUS PRIME X299 Deluxe which costs $499 US.") Which sound logical, because they can address more the fancy gaming enthusiast and maybe less the "prosumers".(With ugly LED show and fire spitting dragons etc.)  If this price dimension would be a general benchmark there is a much lower benefit by using a well priced Threadripper.
This was the reason why I started comparing the prices e.g. Epyc 7401p with 24 cores >1000€ +Gigabyte MZ31-AR0 (?€) with the Ripper and it really interests me what you guys think?!
Wasn´t Epyc already launched, haven´t seen any resellers neither CPUs nor Mainboards. Was it just a paperlaunch or are they all sold to Facebook?

What are your appreciations about both products and appearance in the market. I think TR will come out around August 10th, but Epyc?
Thanks in advance
 
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Ondra on 2017-07-23, 20:25:24
hi,
only thing  I can tell you is that we have not received any yet, and there are no entries in the corona benchmark... https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/?cpu-type=amd&submit=Search

so we will keep waiting ;)
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: maru on 2017-07-24, 10:39:08
just for future reference, there are some i9 entries already :)
https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/?cpu-type=i9&submit=Search
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Fritzlachatte on 2017-07-26, 18:38:35
Hi,
with the benchmark search is a good idea, thanks.
I was just thinking about the sense or benefit of buying an Epyc CPU/Board instead of a Threadripper in hope somebody would have known exact prices or had experiences.
Was just wondering if I missed something because nobody is offering the Epyc CPUs + equipment and AMD always talks about CPUs for Datacenters. Therefrom it might have been just for large companies at the beginning... but we will see, thanks.
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Ryuu on 2017-07-31, 12:14:37
AFAIK the Epyc chips were so far released only to few OEM partners (like Supermicro) and not to the general public.
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Ondra on 2017-07-31, 12:38:55
Hi,
with the benchmark search is a good idea, thanks.
I was just thinking about the sense or benefit of buying an Epyc CPU/Board instead of a Threadripper in hope somebody would have known exact prices or had experiences.
Was just wondering if I missed something because nobody is offering the Epyc CPUs + equipment and AMD always talks about CPUs for Datacenters. Therefrom it might have been just for large companies at the beginning... but we will see, thanks.
long story short, nobody has them yet, so there are no statistically significant experiences. That is the early adopters burden to bear...
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Rhodesy on 2017-08-01, 09:59:03
Financially its probably not a bad shout looking at the dual cpu option for what I can tell. Looking at the mobos available for threadripper and they are £500 so quite close to a workstation board and the 'lower end' 16 core EPYC is priced quite cheaply. So if your having to buy all the ram and case and psu etc. anyway, the extra cost of the second cpu and cooler is only a small fraction of the cost. Yes its slower clock so probably better for a node but still I would imagine better bang for the buck.
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Fritzlachatte on 2017-08-01, 15:39:18
Thanks, you are all right, I think the step from 1070€ to 1700€ is not that large + the dual CPU Mainboard. But I catch myself by delaying the purchase since Ryzen came around.
I really hate all those embarrassing gaming-boards and don´t want to be in the gaming enthusiast´s sector, but all local resellers of serversystems just have completely no informations about prices and release dates. They all say:" We can tell you anything about Xeon and Threadrippers, but Epyc, sorry!"
I fear it might have been cool, but epyc comes too late for me. I think I will search for a completely opaque tower chassis to avoid the risk of epylpsy and ignore the nice but unused quad-sly compatibility, they are all offering :-) 
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Dippndots on 2017-08-09, 18:27:45
there's a couple 1950x in the benchmark list now

https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/?cpu-type=1950x&submit=Search (https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/?cpu-type=1950x&submit=Search)
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Nejc Kilar on 2017-08-10, 15:45:49
And the reviews are out too :)

www.videocardz.com/71804/amd-ryzen-threadripper-review-roundup (http://www.videocardz.com/71804/amd-ryzen-threadripper-review-roundup)

Great stuff!
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Fluss on 2017-08-10, 16:18:19
Holy cores cow ! That looks great !
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: 4b4 on 2017-08-10, 17:22:32
I'm tempted to take the plunge on a 1950X. I'm currently chugging away on a i7 4930 so I'm looking at an almost 3x increase in performance which is pretty hard to ignore.

Anyway else tempted or placed an order?

Any tips on motherboard, RAM, etc.

Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Fluss on 2017-08-10, 18:22:00
I would wait a bit more, mobos are way too pricey for now
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: lolec on 2017-08-11, 01:41:57
Around 3000 cinebench score at stock speeds and I've seen 3440 score while OC. It might do Corona benchmark just a bit under 1 hour if OC, quite impressive!!  I wish there was a "plain" MOBO with no gaming bs, but then again they will probably target it to workstations and the markup is even higher in that market.
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Cheesemsmsm on 2017-08-11, 08:19:47
1920x :D
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: hrvojezg00 on 2017-08-11, 13:19:29
Cinebench score isn't very accurate, more cores, less accurate in my experience. We have several 2cpu E5 systems and for example, one shows 4250 cb , another one 4850 cb, but the same score in Corona benchmark. Thats why Corona benchmark is the one we look at when making new systems.
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: Ryuu on 2017-08-11, 13:56:50
Which E5 CPUs are those?
Title: Re: Threadripper Vs. Epyc and their market appearance
Post by: 4b4 on 2017-08-11, 14:48:19
This looks like about a 10% bump in performance using Corona with DDR4-3200 with a 1920X - I guess that should give a similar bump with the 1950X.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/75827-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1920x-1950x-review-19.html