Messages

121

General CG Discussion / Mental ray GPU ?

« on: 2014-07-09, 16:44:55 »

I found this http://blog.mentalray.com/2014/07/07/mental-rays-gpu-accelerated-gi-engine-prototype/

I dont know if its good idea or not, but any way are good news.

122

[Max] Resolved Feature Requests / White balance color picker?

« on: 2014-07-08, 12:06:38 »

Maybe one color picker for white balance in the render window? what do you think?

Thanks!

123

Work in Progress/Tests / Re: KID ROOM

« on: 2014-06-29, 18:27:11 »

Nice design and compositions, great!

124

[Max] General Discussion / Re: No corona vs redshift comparison so far?

« on: 2014-06-25, 14:33:11 »

Thanks for the info. Now I think is better the xeon's option.

Best regards

125

[Max] General Discussion / Re: No corona vs redshift comparison so far?

« on: 2014-06-20, 12:46:56 »

Thanks for your answer Animator89.
I was thinking in that posibility because I saw some nice images from octane and redshift. But I realy dont know if in the present the Gpu renderers are capable to execute big scenes like others based on cpu. The vram limit of gpu maybe dont permit to realize this archviz scenes?

Thanks guys!

126

[Max] General Discussion / Re: No corona vs redshift comparison so far?

« on: 2014-06-17, 20:55:04 »

Good idea!, but this apearse like 3th option.

Seriously, between this 2 options, what you do you think is better for professional purpose now.

Of couse i'd like to get some license of corona, Im waiting for you ...

127

[Max] General Discussion / Re: No corona vs redshift comparison so far?

« on: 2014-06-17, 18:57:53 »

Im thinking about upgrade my pc (I have 4000$ for this).

What do you think is better, in performance terms:

My Intel Core i7-4820K with 4 Geforce GTX Titan for Gpu render or a Dual Intel Xeon E5-2680 2.7
The option Cpu cost 3500$ and Gpu 4000$, more or less ...

Thanks!

128

Gallery / Re: Evermotion Test scenes

« on: 2014-03-05, 14:37:50 »

For my the vray image looks more saturated. The glass in the corona render looks more natural. I dont know if this is for the material parameters or not.

Nice test.

129

[Max] General Discussion / Re: What for the new efficent rendering computer

« on: 2014-03-03, 12:26:41 »

Test results prove the 4820K indeed offers better performance. It scored 10,975 in the PassMark benchmark, in contrast with the 4770K at 10,016 points. However, the single core benchmark shows that only 5 points separate the two processors. This negligible difference means that the 4820K’s advantage will only be felt for applications which utilize multiple cores. (From hxxp.cpuboss.com)

130

[Max] General Discussion / Re: What for the new efficent rendering computer

« on: 2014-03-02, 14:03:50 »

I prefer i7 4820K, socket 2011. I have one and works very nice. For cheap configuration you can choose Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4, for me the best Quality/prize.

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4820K CPU @ 4.3GHz
Time: 0:4:42, Rays/s: 4,500,532

And easy Overclockable!

131

News / Re: 3ds Max 2014 SP4 released

« on: 2014-02-26, 16:27:56 »

Thanks, Im downloading now. You know if more bugs are fixed?

132

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Discourse about the MATERIALS

« on: 2014-02-20, 16:01:19 »

+1 for the first image

133

[Max] Corona Goodies - User Contributions / Re: Advanced Corona Material Converter (continuous updates)

« on: 2014-02-18, 14:37:01 »

In my work all works in vray Im the pioneer whith Corona, and all days I use this tool to convert my partner's works.

Thanks so much!

134

[Max] Corona Goodies - User Contributions / Re: Advanced Corona Material Converter (continuous updates)

« on: 2014-02-18, 14:25:15 »

Is this normal? I'm using the last build of corona ( Feb 17 2014 )

Thanks

135

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene

« on: 2014-02-05, 22:11:20 »

Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4820K CPU @ 4.3GHz
Time: 0:4:42, Rays/s: 4,500,532