I'm missing lower part of the hill in your render. IMHO it's very strong part of composition in the original. Other than that very good and accurate recreate.
I would add that in architectural shots, esp. exteriors, more squarish (like 4:3 ) image ratio frames the building much better than the display 16:9. I still use 16:9/16:10 for most of our work (because it primarily goes as full-frame image on marketing websites), but here the original composition shows that well.
Also, vertical correction absolutely goes to every shot with exception of those that are built around vertical perspective (like staring from ground into skyscrapper). If it looks too harsch and artificial, use 90perc. vertical correction. ( press auto-correct and than deduct a little bit). This creates the same illusion our brain does (otherwise our brain will over-correct).