Nice :) We have to sort priorities, switching to new versions is usually not so straightforward and we have to choose carefully :)
Interesting what you said, we have the experience architects are pretty conservative and even big studios are holding their licenses for quite a long period. And if they are switching, usually following this pattern 21->23, 22->24 skipping the next major release of their current version.
Generally this is true for a few reasons.
Migrating to new versions for architects is usually a bit task (with most projects having to run in the new versions rather than having some still on the old version and some still on the new), and due to issues like occasional instability and bugs and sometimes lack of new features to justify upgrading, some architects will opt to skip one version as they upgrade every other version or alternatively keep their office and projects a version behind the current version (with the thinking being that any version you're currently using or upgrading to, is the most stable one since Graphisoft have released all the necessary hotfixes/service packs for it and stabilized any new features).
But not all offices follow this logic as some upgrade immediately to the newest version.
(though, even those that upgrade to the latest version usually wait for a couple of weeks or months after the official release date for the first hotfix before upgrading or migrating their projects if they do. Again, for stability reasons).
So it wouldn't be exaggerating to say that if you're one of the offices upgrading immediately to the newest version, you're doing so knowing that you likely won't have access to your favorite third party plugins and addons until a while after its release since most third party developers are like you and don't have any early access to upgrade their plugins and have it ready for release with or soon after the official release of ArchiCAD itself.
Right now, even one of Graphisoft newest and stronger third party partners (Epicgames; makers of Unreal Engine and Twinmotion) don't have the latest version of their program ready for ArchiCAD 23 yet either and they've been working with GS to release this new version and cross promote each other.
So it's not unusual.
Personally I'm okay with you guys being able to port Corona into a most stable version of ArchiCAD even if it means you're doing so a couple of months late (especially since I personally don't upgrade to the latest version until 5 or 6 months later typically).Also I imagine porting to new versions is fairly complex for third party developers - with the potential of bugs on tops of bugs that might have not been patched yet by Graphisoft themselves - so the choice of porting to a (relatively) more stable version or state of a new ArchiCAD version seems to me to be a wiser decision.