Wait, I don't think the Box price is too high, it's just I was expecting a price tag a bit under the price, and the other thing I said is that when the pricing scheme was revamped there was a lot of attention towards the SaaS licensing, including the render node licensing and such, but for the Box license there was nothing except removing the 90 days of grace, so there was nothing positive but something negative.
Now the SaaS model mixed with Box model is great becuase there is choice, and that is great, and of course the price tag should be decided by devs deciding it based on their maths, not on our desires, wich we express here, but that doesn't mean that the Box price is unfair or insanely high, I think is great, but a bit more flexibility could be great, that's why I proposed the "late subscription" option, that wont add any mess to the management of the licenses, wich was one of the main concerns Keymaster and the team had based on what I read about licensing.
And the other thing was about the floating license in SaaS and not floating in Box, what I see is a big bias towards SaaS and less love for Box, wich was stated by the team, that were pretty honest explaining their choices and theis point of view, but I would like a big more love towards the Box license model, maybe not as much as the SaaS wich is the preferred by the team, but a bit more :)
Anyways, of ocurse we can speak all we want and expose our POV's, the decision has to be made by the team and, at least in my case, I won't change my mind about thinking about them as a pretty fair team and really commited towards their users and product, becuase they demonstrated that in the past and with all their explanations and involvement here.
Keymaster I think you got upset, maybe for my words, please don't be, I'm always trying to be as constructive as possible and of course with the best of the intentions, accept my apologies if I bothered you, and read my messages in a constructive way please, also I think the others are sharing the same idea.
Cheers.