Corona tests

[peterguthrie]

46MRays/s, O_o? What kind of machine do you have, and does it come with its own nuclear reactor?

BTW: I have made some tests with 10 000 000 000 000 scattered polygons some time ago, but I cannot find it :/

same as Bertrand ;)

[SHD]

46MRays/s, O_o? What kind of machine do you have, and does it come with its own nuclear reactor?

BTW: I have made some tests with 10 000 000 000 000 scattered polygons some time ago, but I cannot find it :/

same as Bertrand ;)

interesting, do you passed this test?  >>  http://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,559.0.html

[lasse1309]

Hi Bertand,

as I wrote on your blog, I am very happy seeing you putting your hands on corona!

And as I now read here on the forum: I am also very happy that I might have contributed to that at least a bit with my cheerful corona-praisings ;)

all the best
Lasse

[Polymax]

Awesome! And welcome ;)

[EarthMover]

Corona PORN!   The glass in that second image is near flawless.  The whole collection really exemplifies Bertrand's talent for modeling in general and really brings out the attention to detail in each piece.  Images like these have to cause a bit of Chaos and Chaos. 

*I too would love to see multi-texture support.   

[aldola]

great!! i just loved the 5 blades bokeh , perhaps you can try pt+hd its really faster and withouth a significant loose in quality

[peterguthrie]

interesting, do you passed this test?  >>  http://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,559.0.html

added it. 2 mins 41s

[SHD]

interesting, do you passed this test?  >>  http://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,559.0.html

added it. 2 mins 41s

yes I've seen, but I think your pc can faster (this test was done when corona had some problems with xeon .. )

[Ludvik Koutny]

The benchmark scene does not have any problems with dual Xeons. That bug is long gone. The problem is that HDcache, which is used in the benchmark does not scale properly. It is known issue and it will be hopefully resolved. If the test was PT+PT, then you would see more appropriate differences between rendertimes.

The thing is that it was not released as a CPU benchmark, it is not intended to compare CPU speed, but to show you how fast can corona render on your computer in practical scenario ;)

[blackhaus]

hey, Betrand,
Very nice to see you here.
You're tests are as great as you're as an artist, congrat.

I share the same thoughts of you related to the simplicity of corona,
the best result you can achieve with the defaults settings is outstanding.
Personally, this is on of the best advantage  to switch to corona, I can care much more time
improving the image by my own ( composition, material, texture, lighting), instead of playing around with magical settings.

As you said, I agree with you there's a missing on the road, that we have at Vray,
that makes me wait a little more to completely switch to corona, I really like the efforts the guys are making
to implement this stuffs, hope sooner to have access to it :)

Anyway, great images as always, they're impeccable.
Cheers
Fernando

[yagi]

these are just tests? i can imagine what images would be produced when you get serious. smh....  lol

[Ondra]

ok, so... who is left uninfected? Alex Roman? Whoever brings him in has a beer from me waiting :D

[rafpug]

Good evening

Thanks to this forum and CoronaRenderer,
I'm learning not only my first rendering engine provides unbiased/biased
but I'm finding a lot of professional people to learn many things.


Hello BBB3viz
very suggestive images, compliments..!


Regards
Raf

[William Yan]

Dear BBB3VIZ, Very beautiful works!!!Love the oil paint like feel of your images! Love it!   

[xt13r]

ok, so... who is left uninfected? Alex Roman? Whoever brings him in has a beer from me waiting :D

Oh, if Alex Roman will come to Corona render - that will be outstanding)))

BBB3VIZ, your works are amazing as usual!