31
[Max] General Discussion / Re: Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene
« on: 2015-03-15, 17:59:20 »
Sorry for posting this in Corona related thread.
You can find an updated version here in the following thread.
After optimizing the scene (light portals etc.) I get an almost clean render after 50 seconds.
I think this can be optimized even further.
https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,6758.45.html
These infos are a little bit outdated.
I got my Titans for 900€ each and the Titan Z for 1400€.
Also vram consumption is very moderate. You can easily render complex scenes with proxies and stuff below 5 gb. It's not comparable to convential system ram.
You also have the option to use system ram for textures.
The new Titan X is coming out next week with 12gb of vram.
It seems like this card could be as fast as one Titan Z card (TBC!).
I don't want to advertise Octane here, just clarify some facts.
It was not the intention to start a never ending debate which engine is better, just wanted to give you guys a comparison.
You can find an updated version here in the following thread.
After optimizing the scene (light portals etc.) I get an almost clean render after 50 seconds.
I think this can be optimized even further.
https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,6758.45.html
just for fun, 1 TitanZ 3000$ of amazon, 1 Titan 1200$. Hard limited to 6gb vram.
These infos are a little bit outdated.
I got my Titans for 900€ each and the Titan Z for 1400€.
Also vram consumption is very moderate. You can easily render complex scenes with proxies and stuff below 5 gb. It's not comparable to convential system ram.
You also have the option to use system ram for textures.
The new Titan X is coming out next week with 12gb of vram.
It seems like this card could be as fast as one Titan Z card (TBC!).
I don't want to advertise Octane here, just clarify some facts.
It was not the intention to start a never ending debate which engine is better, just wanted to give you guys a comparison.