Messages

1

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2015-01-27, 08:44:09 »

tell you what, if either one of the groups convinces developers of the software to help us with the implementation, then we do that software first :D

Market research, yes, but considering your statement....and since you have been contacted by developers from The Foundry.....when do you start?  ;-p

2

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-28, 09:18:56 »

No, I'm not a native english speaker. And yes, that is the definition of the word:
to accept or regard (something) as true
to accept the truth of what is said by (someone)
to have (a specified opinion)

Assumption however:
an assuming that something is true
a fact or statement (as a proposition, axiom, postulate, or notion) taken for granted

My main point was that without factual numbers your statements are no more valid or no less a "dream" (your words) than mine. And I have never said that they had more users than C4D, only that I believe Modo has more than LW....
Cheap or not...there are already Modo and LW users moving that way......

3

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-28, 00:25:31 »

I can't remember Octane meeting the same "resistance" (if we can call it that) as V-Ray in the NT forums, quite the oposite actually (which I found to be a bit funny). Bought the plugin for LW myself, so Corona in Modo would be of more use to me.
And you are better off looking for LW obsessions in the Newtek forums :-)

4

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-27, 20:56:47 »

Who claimed LW users said they didn't need Octane? Only you as far as I can see.....

5

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-27, 18:19:53 »

LOL. And I am the one that is supposed to be dreaming here? If your "dream" should come true, I doubt they would run back to LW....Blender is a more likely option IMO.
And unless you have the actual numbers of users you're just making assumptions like me, only difference being that I know I was making one....note the use of "I believe"....

6

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-26, 11:13:28 »

No surprise there´s no V-Ray since in every V-Ray discussion over at the NT forums there are LW users stating that they don´t need it.....  ;-p

7

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-25, 23:38:41 »

i think Corona has few contenders there and would sell surprisingly well.

With Kray, Octane, Maxwell in addition to Arnold and Renderman soon available for LW I think you have fewer contenders on the Modo side IMO (Octane, Maxwell and Vray) And I believe, a larger user base....

8

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2014-09-21, 23:02:37 »

Another Modo vote here

9

Porting and API / Re: Corona for Modo

« on: 2014-09-21, 23:00:56 »

Another vote for Modo