Author Topic: dinner-living room residential  (Read 5027 times)

2015-10-01, 20:28:45

VASLAVO

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
Hi to all,

Here is our new project. We would love your comment and suggestions.

Software used : 3ds Max,Corona 1.21, Photoshop, 8 hour render aprox each image at 3k resolution,

2015-10-01, 22:21:49
Reply #1

bluebox

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 268
    • View Profile
Overall a good job. Lack of details in the window models and poor quality background image bring it down significantly imho.

As a side question, why people keep posting rendertimes without their hardware specs ?
It's like stating that you dug a 50 meters long ditch of certain depth and width in three days. If you accomplished this with a shovel I assume it would be ok, but if you done this using an excavator you were clearly doing something wrong :D

2015-10-01, 22:56:22
Reply #2

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
Because I would say 70% of users have PCs of comparable speed, differing by, say, factor of 30-50%. Single quad/hexa i7 is pretty much standard nowadays
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2015-10-02, 00:23:00
Reply #3

denisgo22

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 700
    • View Profile
What happened with spots on ceiling?
I work in a company on visualization of exteriors and interiors
8 years and a standard resolution for printing have not less than 4k.
why renderers here on this forum in a very low resolution
or is it smaller versions of the originals.

2015-10-02, 01:15:37
Reply #4

VASLAVO

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
thanks for the replys

@ denisgo22: yes i agree with you about the low resolution but is what the client ask and sometimes the time its a factor and the difference betwen a 3k and a 4k is arround 4 to 6 hours more.


@Bluebox:  yes, we missed some details but we went short of time and i know its not an excuse, ill try to be better next time, about the spec yes you are right mi mistake, the pc specs is i7 3.7ghz 32 gigs of ram.
 about the background is what the client provide and we made magic with this, the actual quality of the background images is really awful.

2015-10-02, 01:52:24
Reply #5

denisgo22

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 700
    • View Profile
Overall impressive work

2015-10-03, 21:16:33
Reply #6

mitviz

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 482
  • Architectural/Product Modeling and Rendering
    • View Profile
    • MITVIZ
had to look twice, excellent work!
Mitviz
Professional Modeling and Rendering Solutions
Intel core i7-5960x cpu @3 GHz, GeForce GTX 970

2015-10-06, 04:12:25
Reply #7

VASLAVO

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
thanks to all, ive found the error for the lights, sometimes when i make a mirror for a corona light with is the light doesnt actually mirror itself on the rendering process but in viewport it seems ok, will work on it.

2015-10-07, 03:44:20
Reply #8

mitviz

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 482
  • Architectural/Product Modeling and Rendering
    • View Profile
    • MITVIZ
i agree with bluebox, i think we all should now post your pc specs in our signatures:) because even though i have a nice pc its tough sometimes to get the same render times
Mitviz
Professional Modeling and Rendering Solutions
Intel core i7-5960x cpu @3 GHz, GeForce GTX 970

2015-10-07, 09:43:26
Reply #9

MGDesignUK

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 206
    • View Profile
    • MG Design UK
Love the second image with the chandelier in :) how did you achieve the soft natural lighting for each of the visuals?

Keep up the good work.
MG Design UK - 3D Visualisation Studio Based In Surrey