Author Topic: Corona 1.3 Benchmark  (Read 254467 times)

2022-11-22, 15:50:41
Reply #240

amitgedia1980

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor
 Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4.3
Render Time: 0:01:08, Rays/sec: 7,090,030

2022-12-22, 10:15:55
Reply #241

t.nespA++

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know why my pc (pc_Tiziano) has a calculation time of 1:28 sec and makes 5 million beams against that of my colleague (pc_Marco with identical hardware) takes 46 sec and makes 10 million beams? When my pc performs the calculation, the cpu goes to 100%, what does it depend on?
This is the configuration of the 2 pcs:

Operating System
   Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
CPU
   AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX   55 °C
   Colfax 12nm Technology
RAM
   128GB Dual-Channel Unknown @ 1064MHz (15-15-15-36)
Motherboard
   ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME X399-A (SP3r2)   59 °C
Graphics
   4083MB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti (NVIDIA)   39 °C
Storage
   1863GB Western Digital WDC WD20EFRX-68EUZN0 (SATA )   27 °C
   931GB Western Digital WDC WD10EFRX-68PJCN0 (SATA )   27 °C
   931GB Western Digital WD Blue SN570 1TB (Unknown (SSD))

2022-12-22, 13:03:09
Reply #242

TomG

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 5434
    • View Profile
Main suspects would be things like one is overheating and so throttling (cooler could be incorrectly attached), something else is running on the machine and limiting the availability of the CPU, something is badly seated like RAM and this is causing intermittent problems, or some Windows setting is different e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/9764si/windows_is_having_issues_with_2990wx/
Tom Grimes | chaos-corona.com
Product Manager | contact us

2022-12-22, 14:17:18
Reply #243

t.nespA++

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Thanks so much Tom! I check everything!

Tiziano

2022-12-22, 15:34:09
Reply #244

TomG

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 5434
    • View Profile
You're welcome, if nothing shows up under those possibilities, let us know! Or let us know if something does show up too, I am interested to find out why this might be happening.
Tom Grimes | chaos-corona.com
Product Manager | contact us

2023-01-09, 10:07:41
Reply #245

t.nespA++

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Hi Tom!
The computer technician solved the problem by updating and optimizing the motherboard bios and updating all drivers including windows, in fact it had never been done in 5 years of computers! :-)
Thanks for the support
« Last Edit: 2023-01-09, 10:28:18 by t.nespA++ »

2023-01-09, 13:45:04
Reply #246

TomG

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 5434
    • View Profile
Thanks for coming back to report the cause and solution! It's always useful to hear, and may help others in a similar situation. Glad all is resolved for you now!
Tom Grimes | chaos-corona.com
Product Manager | contact us

2023-02-06, 09:33:18
Reply #247

simtub

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Dual EPYC 7T83 with 256 GB of old 2666 MHz RAM - 9 sec

Just wondering how much Ram you have in your system and how is the RAM fitted in the system, 4 channel or 8 channel?
We just got a Dual EPYC 7773x and we're averaging 20 seconds on the benchmark which seems super slow.

2023-02-08, 10:28:44
Reply #248

simtub

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Just wondering what do these numbers mean at the end of the CPU column?

2023-02-08, 18:06:15
Reply #249

maru

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 12711
  • Marcin
    • View Profile
Normally it means the number of physical CPUs. But it also means that sometimes our benchmark does not detect that number correctly. :)

We are working on a new benchmark where this (among other things) will be improved.
Marcin Miodek | chaos-corona.com
3D Support Team Lead - Corona | contact us

2023-02-09, 01:04:15
Reply #250

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4743
    • View Profile
    • studio website
To be honest, even the latest Cinebench R23 gets some numbers and windows version all wrong. Might just be hard to get accurate reports from unusual platforms.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2023-02-18, 00:35:38
Reply #251

absolute-fx

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Modeling workstation:
i9 13900 ks, msi z690 ace, 128Go DDR5 5600MHz (4000MHz because xmp does not work with 4 sticks... another story...) , rtx 4090 suprim X, windows 11
It renders until the end but crashes when it populates results...
-> 44s,  11 185 291 rays

Notebook workstation (MSI RAIDER GE77HX)
i9-12900HX, 64Go DDR5 4800MHz, RTX 3080TI, win 11 (also crash at the end)
-> 1.13m, 6 308 106 rays

Rendering station (5 years +)
Dual xeon E5 2696 V4, 128 Go DDR3 2133MHz, GTX 1080 Rog Strix, Z10 PE-DW WS, windows 10
-> 48s, 10 710 948 rays

The result in cinebench R23 tells a different story... +38.000 points for I9 13900ks and +28.000 points for the xeons (quite huge as difference...)
It makes me questioning. Does bucket rendering takes more advantage of the processor power? Does corona can take full advantage of 12 or 13th gen proc architecture?
If we use blind maths the I9 should have been rendered in about 32s.

Just trying to understand... Any guess?



« Last Edit: 2023-02-18, 00:51:09 by absolute-fx »

2023-02-18, 01:10:19
Reply #252

absolute-fx

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
I've just run cinebench r23 on the notebook and the results seems to be +/- on the good ratio with 19.000 points.
So I just wondering why this ratio is so different with a 13th gen proc.

2023-03-01, 12:13:25
Reply #253

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4743
    • View Profile
    • studio website
I would not pay too much heed to any result from current benchmark. Cinebench R23 is far newer, and Corona will eventually prepare new benchmark :- )

What I do to compare pure "multi-threaded" speed (but I rarely do that nowadays since I value smoothness of workflow more than brute speed) is using production scene, and only paying attention to Ray/s.

Don't worry about memory speed for both 13th gen Intel and Zen3+ platforms for work. Neither can support more than 4600 MT/s +/- when memory reaches total of 8-ranks. Which for DDR5 memory usually means 4 DIMMS. It doesn't affect almost any workstation task at all, I've tested this with dual-channel 64GB 5600/6400 on my HX12800 & HX 13800 laptops vs 128GB at 4000 on my Dell&MSI laptops. Since with lower MT/s you can also lower the timings, the latency is identical, you only lose bandwidth but that doesn't affect anything with current-gen hardware when it comes to most SPEC/Workstation tasks.

Funny, I had HX 12800 for 6 months and HX 13800 for 2 months and I didn't even bother to run Corona benchmark at all :- ).
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2023-04-10, 08:22:54
Reply #254

3DInteriors

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 61
    • View Profile
    • 3D Interiors
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970x 32 core
64 Gb RAM
Render Time : 39 sec
12,365 M  Rays/sec