This would be very very awesome! Not event great, but also grand, large maybe...
Anyway bit
ontopic-ish OT, when i was rendering visualisation (
http://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,336.0.html) on my friends computer, he suggested one thing.
Why not move (on demand!) VBF from RAM to HDD?
Backstory is that, he had to buy an additional RAM (from 6GB to 16GB), beacuse of the very HiRes render (6k x 6k), which has taken around 10GB of RAM.
I could not give him straight answer. So I gave him quite s***ty answer. "I do not know, I cannot give you propper answer, maybe it could be possible, maby not. Perhaps it is possible, but the disk acces time could be MASSIVELY TERRIBLE, so it would be unusable.. Unles you buy TurboUltraRAID321
tm. Which cost more than new computer with 96GB RAM"
With moving VBF from RAM to HDD, you may render very very large images in cost of speed. Or at the massive cost of speed? (main issue is writing massive nuber of small data, right?)
- So I am asking you folks, is this even possible? Since geometry is in RAM, GI sollution could be cached on disk and light ray exist only for brief moment right?