To be honest, most of the examples you listed are things I'd probably never need, so yeah $2 is great but I'm still not buying.
I often find the price of 3D models to be ridiculous. I understand that hours and hours of work can go into them, but I find there is more value in a scene/collection than individual object. I'm more willing to pay a higher price for say trees/cars more than anything, but still not for an individual one. I also feel that people would sell more volume if their prices were cheaper versus fewer at the higher prices. I mean, let's be honest: if say something like Vizpark trees were $30 for a collection versus $100 they'd make a killing.
I agree with knowing your worth with all the work you put in, but in the end, especially with piracy, more people will be willing to buy at reasonable prices than outrageous ones. I wouldn't find it insulting as a 3D artist if someone was selling a similar, more detailed model for cheaper than I would; that's just business.
I quote all, as I agree with you about everything, and thanks for the answer. I thought about not selling it at a higher price because: triangulated model done in Rhino (don't know why people care about it, if it looks very good), really high amount of poly compared to other models in the same category, not a model you will buy everyday just because it costs less than others, materials only for corona and 3ds max.
I'm able to model it my myself, but it will take; I don't know, 1 hour of my time
15 euro, maybe, for a very complex object, like bed, sofa, car and I havn't time to do it by myself.
Of course, it must be good modeled. Triangle topology in the 2018??? DeEspona ^__^ ? Maybe some bad export from .iges file?
It took more than a hour, because the model was measured first, than modeled. Maybe nobody care about the accuracy, but I do and that's how I do my stuff. It's triangled poly because comes from Rhinoceros, so as I mentioned up above, that's another reason for the low price.