691
[Max] I need help! / Re: output autosave
« on: 2016-03-01, 10:08:53 »
Great stuff thanks Romullus :)
I'd still request that this be on by default.
I'd still request that this be on by default.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
While i find adaptivity absolutely awesome, i have mixed feelings about denoising. On one hand, in animations like posted earlier, it could be godsend, OTOH i doubt that i will use it often on stills. I'm not a big fan of clinically clean images in a first place, besides i don't quite like those jpeg compression like artifacts after Corona's denoising. While those usually can be seen only in high zoom, it still leaves "dirty" image impression for me.
Great results...!
Quick question, more related to the denoising feature really - can Corona output a version with and without denoising at the same time? I think it would be ideal if we could blend between them for final renders in post, as some areas become warped during denoising.
Heh I asked exactly about this to Ondra when we talked recently, basically controls for aggressivness of filter, and blending of filtered and non-filtered in framebuffer. He said it's doable, but said it didn't yield positive results from his tests. But that's no definite no :- )
How I planned to use this, was to do this manually, output both filtered and un-filtered results, and mask them with mat-ID pass for mats with little high-frequency details, like flat painted surfaces. There is no detail that I can loose in white ceiling, but I always have shit-ton of noise there.