Author Topic: Corona 1.3 Benchmark  (Read 164247 times)

2020-04-11, 03:45:28
Reply #210

newnew

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Can not to run Benchmark...what can i do???
Do you have internet connection?
Can you send me a testing license?
liulei.n@gmail.com
Thank U!

2020-04-11, 10:12:48
Reply #211

newnew

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Already solved.Thank U.

2020-04-30, 10:37:11
Reply #212

badweb01

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core Processor (x4)
 Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 3.7
Render Time: 0:00:52, Rays/sec: 9 219 870

2020-12-02, 03:58:40
Reply #213

stiggity

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
40 seconds on the military vehicle...
Will continue to improve...
E5-2699 v3

2021-04-21, 12:25:39
Reply #214

Antifreezzz

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Hi Guys, I assembled the PС with AMD Ryzen 9 3950X + Asus ROG B 500E, the render results are below.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor
Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 4
Render Time: 0:00:59, Rays / sec: 8 175 210

59 seconds is 17 seconds longer than the best result, what does it depend on and how can you bring the render speed to the ideal?
« Last Edit: 2021-04-21, 12:29:32 by Antifreezzz »

2021-05-29, 14:17:15
Reply #215

scionik

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Nice benchmark, but it's too old.
Dev team, could you please make a new one with interior scene + caustics, it would be great to test the brand new features and compare the results.
If it will be issued after the release of Corona 7 (with all its feature), it would be awesome.
Thanks.

2021-06-01, 11:34:54
Reply #216

hldemi

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
Nice benchmark, but it's too old.
Dev team, could you please make a new one with interior scene + caustics, it would be great to test the brand new features and compare the results.
If it will be issued after the release of Corona 7 (with all its feature), it would be awesome.
Thanks.

I still has same correlation. If something is faster here by 30% it will be faster similar amount in any scene and any setttings.

2021-06-01, 12:09:36
Reply #217

alexyork

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Partner at Recent Spaces
    • View Profile
    • RECENT SPACES
What we'd ideally really love is a test which is approx. 3-4x more intensive as the old one, as current high-end machines are shredding it in just 14 seconds or so. Plus it should have several intensive elements to denoise, which is really useful to check temps, as we know they climb significantly during denoising. Would it be an issue to start again with a CoronaBenchmark-v2 with a fresh set of results? Also one which doesn't pop up with the vdist thing too, ideally. And even more ideal would be the ability to have it run itself x-times in a row and take an average result.
Alex York
Partner
RECENT SPACES
recentspaces.com

2021-06-02, 11:45:38
Reply #218

Avi

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 117
    • View Profile
Hi Alex,

We made some "advanced" command-line version of the benchmark which supports multi-run & easier averaging. Please find the link attached below to download & test it for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/50g6f06zloptqzg/corona%20automatic%20benchmark.zip?dl=0

I hope this helps.

Thanks.

Regards,
Avi

2021-06-02, 11:57:46
Reply #219

alexyork

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Partner at Recent Spaces
    • View Profile
    • RECENT SPACES
Hey Avi, that looks interesting. Is it possible to set a custom number of passes? And maybe it has denoising too? Or any plans to implement/update?

Cheers,
Alex York
Partner
RECENT SPACES
recentspaces.com

2021-06-02, 20:24:07
Reply #220

Avi

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 117
    • View Profile
Hi,

In reply to your questions:

1. No, it is not possible to set a custom number of passes.
2. Currently, It does not have denoising implemented because this benchmark is from Corona 1.3, and denoising was implemented in 1.4
3. We want to implement a new benchmark at some point but at present, we don't have this planned but in case this changes, we will notify you.

Regards,
Avi

2021-06-03, 10:19:08
Reply #221

alexyork

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 634
  • Partner at Recent Spaces
    • View Profile
    • RECENT SPACES
Thanks for the update, Avi.
Alex York
Partner
RECENT SPACES
recentspaces.com

2021-06-22, 15:31:20
Reply #222

CHITATILLO

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Hello everyone!
Please tell me what can be done in such a situation?
Всем привет!
Подскажите пожалуйста, что можно сделать в такой ситуации?

Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core Processor
 Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 3.1
Render Time: 0:03:16, Rays/sec: 2 467 250

2021-06-22, 15:38:35
Reply #223

TomG

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 3979
    • View Profile
At a guess, the CPU is thermal throttling due to insufficient cooling.

2021-07-18, 07:59:11
Reply #224

Petros Proestos

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • Petros Proestos
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Finished
BTR Scene 16 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz (x2)
 Real CPU Frequency [GHz]: 2.7
Render Time: 0:01:55, Rays/sec: 4.209.790
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein