3
« on: 2023-01-08, 14:27:02 »
In the uk all companies which sell custom build, pre-built (they build if for you) threadripper pcs only sell the latest 5 series threadrippers now. I won't go into specifics of the build with all the other parts, but now I can only get a 5975wx build for the same price as what I used to be able to buy a 3990x build.
With this is mind the only way to still get a 3990x build for the same price is to buy the parts separately. This is ok, but not ideal so I am trying to figure out if its really worth it, or do I just get pcspecialist.co.uk for example to make me a 5975wx build with no fuss of having to do it myself.
This brings me to my main question: How much slower really is the 5975wx than the 3990x. This is very hard to gauge from corona benchmark because if we go by top result for both, then the 3990x is twice as fast nearly! As a side note the 5995wx is only about 1 second faster than a 3990x according to the top benchmarks; and it will cost about £2000 more. I understand people are doing all kinds of stuff to get these results and overclocking the absolute balls of their cpus, but what do I look at to get an accurate comparison?
If I do a search on google for 5975wx vs 3990x multicore I get various results averaging around the 3990x being about 1.15x faster (which is not huge anymore). Should I be looking at Cinibench multicore results for example?
It's a long shot but does anyone own both a 3990x and 5970x with similar hardware and able to give me a comparison. I have a 3990x already which gets about 17 seconds with corona benchmark with pretty standard water cooling, no other bells and whistles. If a 5975wx can only do 25 seconds I think I'll build a 3990x myself. I can get either cpu for about the same price.
Thanks! and please correct me if I'm wrong with any of the above.