Messages

1

[C4D] I need help! / Re: Output large depending on viewport sizeRender Si

« on: Yesterday at 11:13:42 »

hm hm are you using Interactive Rendering to render your images? If so then you can go under Edit -> Preferences -> Corona -> untoggle "Adjust render resolution to VFB".

That said you probably shouldn't be using Interactive Rendering to render out your final images because IR is a bit more optimized for interactivity and such so the actual fully rendered images might take a bit longer to render out.

It is entirely possible I've misunderstood you here too and so if that is the case please let me know how I got ya wrong :)

2

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-08-22, 15:58:50 »

So this might not be news to some of you following this thread but I was today years old when I realized EXPO / DOCP makes the memory controller & co consume more power. That in itself might seem completely trivial but that extra consumption is added into the max TDP envelope of the CPU as a whole which means more power for the memory controller and IO die, less power for your cores.

Now it isn't a huge difference mind you but on my end I'm noticing about 5% faster rendering when I drop DOCP. The all core boost is at 3.4ghz (up from 3.3ghz - both boosts without SMT turned on mind you) and I'm also seeing about half the cores reaching peak rated frequency on my 5995wx which is 4.5ghz.

Interesting!

3

Hardware / Re: Threadripper + RTX 4090 Workstation for Cinema 4D & Corona?

« on: 2024-08-22, 14:37:08 »

Howdy!

Those are some really awesome specs either way you flip it but at the same time to me they are two completely different tiers of system.

The 5975WX build is based on the WRX80 workstation platform meaning you get ALL the bells and whistles in terms of expansion capabilities (and other "pro features" like IPMI access that I don't think HEDT TRX50 has) that Zen 3 offers.
That said it is a Zen 3 system so two generations old by now.

On the other hand you have the 7970x which is an HEDT part which means it is a bit more cut down compared to WRX80 (mainly if you need more expansion slots although Zen 4 HEDT has PCI-E gen 5 now compared to 4 on the WRX80) but is noticeably faster than the 5975WX build for when it comes to rendering.

All in all I think you might have to ask yourself what do you need more? Is it rendering speed / compute power or the actual platform itself (aka more expansion slots and IPMI access and the like)?

Personally, if this is mainly to be used for rendering and you don't need a crap ton of IT compliance I'd go with the 7970x. It still has enough expansion slots to fit 2x GPUs (and some of them are PCI-E gen 5) plus if you got slim (think Quadro GPUs) expansion cards you can still have separate addons in there. The ASUS TRX50 Sage for example has 5 usable PCI-E slots which imho is plenty enough. You should double check it but fitting in a single GPU and a couple of NVMEs expanion cards (for up to like 8 drives) should be doable imho. And even that might be overkill depending on your workload.

GPU wise I think a 4080 should be more than fine if you're primarily using the system to do Corona / CPU rendering. Unless you're video editing and doing a crap ton of AI upscaling at the same. I haven't seen many benchmarks but viewport wise 16GB should be more than plenty plus the actual difference in viewport FPS I doubt it'll be noticeable. C4D runs into all kinds of bottlenecks before GPU becomes the biggest problem I think. Do consider VRAM limitations if you're running simulation with the new GPU solvers though.

Memory wise you'll have to go RDIMM (ECC) memory if you go with the 7970x build. Double check this please but I'm pretty certain you can do UDIMM (non ECC) memory on the WRX80. I keep forgetting what I'm running (also on WRX80). It will cost you a little bit more going TRX50 in this case but do remember the 7970x is quite a bit faster for rendering than the 5975wx.

I don't think I'd over complicate it with memory speeds. If you can easily digest the 5600mhz price tag I'd say go with it. If you can't I do think 5200mhz will work just fine as it shouldn't be a noticeable change unless you're high refresh rate gaming or have memory speed intensive workloads (rendering is not).

Storage you've got pretty nicely picked out although I'd maybe suggest looking into Kioxia and WD too. WD has some really sweet deals lately on some of their stuff.

Motherboards I'd say go with whatever floats your boat in terms of the layout and brands you wanna deal with. Personally I'm on the WRX80 ASUS Sage atm and it's a really nice experience. Mileage does vary as everyone has different experiences with different brands and vendors.

Cooling wise, the 7970x won't be "easy" from what I'm reading. It's basically the 3970x on steroids which I do own and can attest it does require solid airflow with a beefy cooler. A lot of people seem to recommend quality AIO / water cooling for this part although between you and me, I'd probably try my fortune with a Noctua U14s with two fans and an airflow focused case (Fractal Design Torrent is great for that imho) - I'm really scared of leaks myself.

So yep, those are my 5 cents. Hope it is helpful :) Oh and don't forget, its all just my own opinion :)

4

Hardware / Re: Intel i9 14900k slower then 13900k-- I need expert help

« on: 2024-08-19, 17:11:23 »

Hmm hmm, based on the scores you are getting I'd say those seem like expected results? If I cross reference comparisons between the 13900k and 14900k on the V-Ray benchmark and websites like CPU Monkey then the two should generally score / perform ~about the same.

The Raptor Like chips (14th gen) seemingly did not impress the press either as they got more or less universally panned for not really being an improvement over 13th gen. It is basically a refresh line of CPUs and some of the reviewers called it "the 13th gen but with a higher number" type release.

I'd say some minor differences are to be expected based on BIOS settings, motherboards, drivers, OS funkiness and things like that but overall, looks to me like they should score about the same for the most part.

5

Corona Academy / Re: News

« on: 2024-08-12, 10:31:17 »

Howdy! The 12 release and summer vacays slowed us down a bit more than maybe we initially anticipated but we are back at it and while we can't say exactly when the next video is coming, it is already in the works.

Super excited to hear you've chosen the Academy path of upping your familiarity with Corona! Hope you're enjoying it!

6

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-07-09, 10:30:35 »

Thanks for your input guys! Greatly appreciated.
While the 7970X seems like a powerful option, considering the price difference compared to the 3995WX (at least in Croatia), I'm leaning towards the 7960X for now.
This should still provide good performance for 3ds Max and Corona while staying within my budget.
The only thing that worries me a bit is the limited availability of Corona benchmark results for the 7960X. Are people avoiding it for some reason?

Is there anything else I should consider when making this decision, or any specific recommendations for RAM or other components to pair with the 7960X for my workstation build?

Well well, pozdravljen sosed :)

The 7960x (24 core) is a bit harder to tame than the 7970x (32 core) and especially the 7980x (64 core). Its mainly got to do with the fact that you've got less cores that are consuming more power and so it basically comes down to the fact that you're cooling 350W in a rather smaller area because there's less cores (that are hotter) compared to the higher core count designs.

People seem to recommend an AIO for this chip, I'd probably still stick a Noctua on it and I also wonder what Juraj would do :)

As to why there aren't that many results I do not know, maybe its the above or maybe peeps just opt for the higher core counts. You can also try checking the V-Ray benchmark, it isn't exactly 1:1 with the Corona benchmark but it can still give you a general idea of the performance imho.

And also, since you're in Croatia, if you're comfortable putting the parts together yourself I'd maybe suggest looking into Caseking or Computeruniverse as the place of purchase. They typically have nice deals although do keep in mind you'll have to ship your parts to Germany / Austria in case of an RMA. I fortunately haven't had one yet but besides that they are treating me real nicely so far at those stores (no affiliation, just sharing my personal experience) :)

7

[C4D] I need help! / Re: Mesh lights in Corona for cinema 4d?

« on: 2024-07-08, 12:54:33 »

Yes indeed, just create a Corona Light material and apply it to the geo. That is all that it takes :) Welcome aboard!

8

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-07-08, 12:45:32 »

Hi everyone, I'm planning to build a new workstation. I'm interested in getting
ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI motherboard and pairing it with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3995WX processor. and 64 gb udimm memory.

My main goal is to achieve a responsive 3ds Max viewport and fast interactive rendering within Corona.
I was hoping to get some feedback from the community on this configuration. Would this be a good setup for my needs?
Are there any potential bottlenecks or compatibility issues I should be aware of?

Thanks in advance for your advice!

To be totally honest I'd personally rather look at the Zen 4 7970x (32 cores) as the centerpiece of the build. Why?

- The 7970x is a highly clocked 32 core CPU compared to the slower clocked 3995wx. The 7970x is also based on Zen 4 rather than Zen 2 which is somewhat old at this point and so there's IPC improvements there alone. Based on the benchmark the 7970x seems ~about as fast as the 3995wx for rendering plus it should be quite a lot quicker in single threaded tasks (interactivity of everything that doesn't require "shit ton of cores" aka viewport stuff).

- On top of that the WRX80 is a tremendous platform but only if you need it. If you don't need the extra PCI-E slots (for multiple GPUs and extra NVME or network or capture cards) then it is imho money wasted.
I'm running 3x NVMEs, 2x 4090 GPUs and I'm still not really taking full advantage of the platform. I could probably get away with a very similar setup on a TRX50 platform (plus the GPUs are so big you can't really slot much else in there except another set of NVMEs via a NVME card).

TRX50 does need RDIMMs though and its DDR5 which will bring the costs up but then on the flip side WRX80 is AFAIK still more expensive for the motherboard alone. Also, looking at the prices the 3995wx is more expensive than the 7970x.

So with the above in mind I'd configure two builds and see which one is cheaper or more fitting for your needs.
My _guess_ would be that TRX50 is going to give you a better overall experience for less money.

9

[C4D] General Discussion / Re: Corona 12 - c4d vs 3dsmax

« on: 2024-07-03, 10:24:56 »

Howdy! Each DCC has its own specifics which makes implementing certain functionality more difficult in one that in the other. Be it due to the APIs at play, limitations of the DCC itself and things of that nature.

Even if there are limitations with the DCC itself the dev team typically tries to overcome them but sometimes it happens that things simply require way more time than expected. This would be one of those times but to end on a positive note, with no promises however, we are working on bringing this functionality over :)

10

[C4D] I need help! / Re: Interactive Render Black Screen Mega Problem!

« on: 2024-07-02, 11:29:26 »

I'm happy to report that Kirtiveer seems to have solved this issue by clearing his C4D preferences folder :) He figured it out on his own, kudos!

11

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-06-28, 13:54:07 »

Wow, what a great timing on that review @kittste.

I'm currently considering a new worskation build and looking into very similar components. I was also hoping that someone could give some insight whether anything is missing or there's some major mistakes there. Attaching a screenshot of parts (doesn't show the amount of parts but going for 4 sticks of 32gb ram)

Looks good to me with a note to double check if that RAM is RDIMM (Registered) and of course that you have 2x of them for at least 64GB (32GB seems rather low for such a build unless you're working on really small scenes) :)

RAM is RDIMM indeed and I cropped out the quantities, there should be 4x32GB sticks of RAM in the build. Already running 128GB of RAM in current workstation and some large scenes eat up even more. Perhaps 256GB would be a more future-proof option.

Sweet and awesome!

Maybe just another consideration, if you're going to put in a 4090 I would personally consider bumping the PSU up to 1200W. With a full load CPU and full load GPU you're already at 750W plus you also need to account for the motherboard and all the other things...
Just a thought :)

12

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-06-28, 09:28:02 »

Wow, what a great timing on that review @kittste.

I'm currently considering a new worskation build and looking into very similar components. I was also hoping that someone could give some insight whether anything is missing or there's some major mistakes there. Attaching a screenshot of parts (doesn't show the amount of parts but going for 4 sticks of 32gb ram)

Looks good to me with a note to double check if that RAM is RDIMM (Registered) and of course that you have 2x of them for at least 64GB (32GB seems rather low for such a build unless you're working on really small scenes) :)

13

Hardware / Re: Threadripper & Ryzen only builds (3rd Gen starts on page 50)

« on: 2024-06-27, 16:06:03 »

@kittste

thank you kindly for sharing that! Really useful information for the rest of us :) I wonder how far a 7980x would go on a the new ProSiphon thingy :)

14

[Max] Resolved Feature Requests / Re: Bendable corona decals.

« on: 2024-06-27, 12:54:06 »

Indeed, with 12 you'll be able to bend decals in two directions. The feature has been available in the daily builds for a while now and is of course also part of the RC builds :)

15

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Gamma Correction Tone Mapping Operator Removed - Bring it back!

« on: 2024-06-07, 13:20:16 »

No worries, we are bringing the gamma operator back just as we discussed it - and in a more artist friendly form so it comes with a couple of other spinners as well :)