Author Topic: Any change in the material balls scene ?  (Read 10285 times)

2017-09-09, 23:04:00
Reply #15

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
the thing is, material editor ball is really low-poly, something you want to avoid either way in production, and that makes the terminator removal work harder and change the result too much
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2017-09-09, 23:43:55
Reply #16

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4761
    • View Profile
    • studio website
the thing is, material editor ball is really low-poly, something you want to avoid either way in production, and that makes the terminator removal work harder and change the result too much

Is it not possible to subdivide it ?
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2017-09-10, 08:24:28
Reply #17

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
well then it would not match the 3dsmax original... disabling terminators is easier and better solution
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2017-09-10, 10:29:00
Reply #18

maru

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 12768
  • Marcin
    • View Profile
I still don't get it why we want to have different result in the mat editor than in the final rendering.
Marcin Miodek | chaos-corona.com
3D Support Team Lead - Corona | contact us

2017-09-10, 12:01:48
Reply #19

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4761
    • View Profile
    • studio website
well then it would not match the 3dsmax original...

But is that important for anyone :- ) ? The fact the ball is rendered makes it already a lot more different.

It would still be sphere.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2017-09-11, 04:21:57
Reply #20

Christa Noel

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 911
  • God bless us everyone
    • View Profile
    • dionch.studio
I still don't get it why we want to have different result in the mat editor than in the final rendering.
i have my own standard materials which the looks in mat preview sill stay the same for years.
but if now i see it brighter than what i used to see then i just simply feels something is going wrong with my material settings even though i know that everything is okay. :)
and its not about the different result we get in the final rendering because i believe we will never renders low poly sphere in actual production ever. ;)

2017-09-11, 09:55:37
Reply #21

Naxos

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
I still don't get it why we want to have different result in the mat editor than in the final rendering.
i have my own standard materials which the looks in mat preview sill stay the same for years.
but if now i see it brighter than what i used to see then i just simply feels something is going wrong with my material settings even though i know that everything is okay. :)
and its not about the different result we get in the final rendering because i believe we will never renders low poly sphere in actual production ever. ;)

plus, the lights in the main scene are not likelly the same that in the mat editor...
Personally i use the mat editor vignettes to see how the shader will look, keeping in mind that it will probably be different regardless of the scene's lighning... But i like to think that my shader is good because of the neutral-ness of the mat editor scene...
That is why i've started this post, because once 1.6.x installed, i've felt like it was no more the case...

Also, maybe it would be nice to get some extra scenes (not only 3dsmax's sphere / cube), like they do in Maxwell : some cloth, some floor, some SSS-ready scenes... Clever !

2017-09-11, 10:39:35
Reply #22

maru

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 12768
  • Marcin
    • View Profile
I still don't get it why we want to have different result in the mat editor than in the final rendering.
i have my own standard materials which the looks in mat preview sill stay the same for years.
but if now i see it brighter than what i used to see then i just simply feels something is going wrong with my material settings even though i know that everything is okay. :)
and its not about the different result we get in the final rendering because i believe we will never renders low poly sphere in actual production ever. ;)
It's not only about low poly spheres. Check out the images from my post here: https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php?topic=17230.msg108730#msg108730
Imagine an abstract situation where in a new version of Corona each render would come out a bit different - for example with a slight blue hue for some reason (let's assume there was an issue with white balance, whatever). What we have now is different output in the material editor (no blue hue), and different in the final rendering (blue hue). I cannot understand why we want to have different result in the material editor, than in the final rendering, even it it's consistent with what we could see in the material editor in older versions. Shouldn't consistency between the material editor and what is actually rendered be the priority??
Marcin Miodek | chaos-corona.com
3D Support Team Lead - Corona | contact us

2017-09-11, 11:07:06
Reply #23

Naxos

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile

It's not only about low poly spheres. Check out the images from my post here: https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php?topic=17230.msg108730#msg108730
Imagine an abstract situation where in a new version of Corona each render would come out a bit different - for example with a slight blue hue for some reason (let's assume there was an issue with white balance, whatever). What we have now is different output in the material editor (no blue hue), and different in the final rendering (blue hue). I cannot understand why we want to have different result in the material editor, than in the final rendering, even it it's consistent with what we could see in the material editor in older versions. Shouldn't consistency between the material editor and what is actually rendered be the priority??

You're right, Maru, but the fact is that the matEditor is no longer nice and pleasant to see...
I did not understaood why there is a difference, but i guess it is a way to render faster or something ?
I just hope old scenes will not render brighter now (i have customers that need to get consistant render over time)...

Vray did that kind of bad surprise to all of us several times, asking "do you want to render as before or as now"... or close to that...
VERY confusing...
With that customer, we have spent a lot of time to validate colors with vray 2.xx... and all was faulty when 3.0 came... we do had to re-validate all the stuff... And when 3.2 came out, all was again bad and we had to validate for the third time... as you may  guess, the customer was not happy and did not want to pay those extra time...

I'm about to ligrate 100% to Corona : this only one last customer left on Vray for now (as you think, he is the biggest of my customers), and i would not want to get some problems like that in the future...

So, maybe it would be good to get an optional parameter for "terminator fix" on / off, that would be included in the scene, so i can open old scene without any problem and render as it rendered before...

BTW, can you (shortly if you don't have time enough) explain wht is "terminator fix", and why it is needed and wanted... ?

Regrads

2017-09-11, 11:30:42
Reply #24

pokoy

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1865
    • View Profile
The terminator fix was introduced to suppress visible artifacts where the shadow 'ends', you had to subdivide geometry to get rid of it before. The terminator fix will now more or less hide them by shifting the shadow slightly. Depending on your geometry and lighting setup this can result in noticeable differences between old and newer Corona versions. Most of the time you won't see it, however.
To disable, get the Development/Experimental Tab to display in Corona's System Settings, and look for the Shadow Shift parameter: 0 - terminator fix enabled, 1 - terminator fix disabled.

2017-09-11, 11:45:48
Reply #25

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4761
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Whoa, I can assure anyone I saw like zero difference in actual scenes with terminator fix. And it helped my life tremendously as I suffered from it on pretty much every single fabric and I use those a lot. Often, even subdividing meshes into hundred million (yes, for bed and stuff).
No need to panic because the mat editor shows weird behavior, the light setup is weird there anyway.

Terminator fix is the best thing that happened to Corona, no need to worry about anything, it's been months that I've been testing it.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2017-09-11, 11:46:12
Reply #26

Naxos

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
The terminator fix was introduced to suppress visible artifacts where the shadow 'ends', you had to subdivide geometry to get rid of it before. The terminator fix will now more or less hide them by shifting the shadow slightly. Depending on your geometry and lighting setup this can result in noticeable differences between old and newer Corona versions. Most of the time you won't see it, however.
To disable, get the Development/Experimental Tab to display in Corona's System Settings, and look for the Shadow Shift parameter: 0 - terminator fix enabled, 1 - terminator fix disabled.

Nice... Will it remains with the max scene file ?... So some older scenes are off and newer ones are on ?

2017-09-11, 11:48:28
Reply #27

Naxos

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
Whoa, I can assure anyone I saw like zero difference in actual scenes with terminator fix. And it helped my life tremendously as I suffered from it on pretty much every single fabric and I use those a lot. Often, even subdividing meshes into hundred million (yes, for bed and stuff).
No need to panic because the mat editor shows weird behavior, the light setup is weird there anyway.

Terminator fix is the best thing that happened to Corona, no need to worry about anything, it's been months that I've been testing it.

I want to believe ;-)
Just fix the material editor scene so it is nice again ;-)

2017-09-11, 11:51:39
Reply #28

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4761
    • View Profile
    • studio website
I think Ondra already "fixed" it by taking it to previous state (no terminator fix in mat editor), should be in current daily build. Should look exactly like it did.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2017-09-11, 12:44:34
Reply #29

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
yes, it is fixed in new daily. As I said - the material editor sphere it waaaaay too low poly for production, so I disabled terminator handling for it, as it was kinda extreme
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)