Author Topic: FStorm vs Corona  (Read 41883 times)

2016-03-15, 16:35:15
Reply #30

cecofuli

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1577
    • View Profile
    • www.francescolegrenzi.com
With 5 nodes Twin X5660 Xeons = Intelligent configuration =)

RAW cost:

Twin X5660 =  1.300 euro x 5 =  6500 euro

(*) 980 GTX = 500 euro * 10 = 5000
(*) 3 PC nodes = 500 euro * 3 =1500
(*) TOT =  6500 euro

With 10x 980GTX you can do a lot of things, very fast for interior... but:

(*) 4 GB VRAM (forget complex outdoor projects)
(*) 10 GPU + 3 nodes eat  A LOT, A LOT of electricity! More than 5 double Xeons, believe me!

Honestly, I prefer Xeon Config.

2016-03-15, 16:51:41
Reply #31

Nekrobul

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 1026
    • View Profile
With 5 nodes Twin X5660 Xeons = Intelligent configuration =)

RAW cost:

Twin X5660 =  1.300 euro x 5 =  6500 euro

(*) 980 GTX = 500 euro * 10 = 5000
(*) 3 PC nodes = 500 euro * 3 =1500
(*) TOT =  6500 euro

With 10x 980GTX you can do a lot of things, very fast for interior... but:

(*) 4 GB VRAM (forget complex outdoor projects)
(*) 10 GPU + 3 nodes eat  A LOT, A LOT of electricity! More than 5 double Xeons, believe me!

Honestly, I prefer Xeon Config.

We are buying one plate for 600Eur
---------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.blackbellstudio.com/
https://www.behance.net/blackbell3d
CEO at "Blackbell Studio"

2016-03-15, 17:53:53
Reply #32

BorderLine

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
With 5 nodes Twin X5660 Xeons = Intelligent configuration =)

RAW cost:

Twin X5660 =  1.300 euro x 5 =  6500 euro

(*) 980 GTX = 500 euro * 10 = 5000
(*) 3 PC nodes = 500 euro * 3 =1500
(*) TOT =  6500 euro

With 10x 980GTX you can do a lot of things, very fast for interior... but:

(*) 4 GB VRAM (forget complex outdoor projects)
(*) 10 GPU + 3 nodes eat  A LOT, A LOT of electricity! More than 5 double Xeons, believe me!

Honestly, I prefer Xeon Config.

+1

2016-03-15, 23:05:02
Reply #33

Nejc Kilar

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 1251
    • View Profile
    • My personal website
Don't these new GPU renderers have Out-Of-Core rendering features? If that is the case then the vram problem is not that much of a problem anymore, or is it?
Nejc Kilar | chaos-corona.com
Educational Content Creator | contact us

2016-03-15, 23:14:44
Reply #34

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4761
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Don't these new GPU renderers have Out-Of-Core rendering features? If that is the case then the vram problem is not that much of a problem anymore, or is it?

Does Octane ? I know only for sure that Redshift does, which is technically pretty revolutionary renderer. With that said, Out-of-Core almost always come with performance hit. It's not exactly like harddrive swapping, but neither a magic bullet solution.

The 16/32GB next-gen cards, which are around corner, are the true solution.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2016-03-16, 07:52:16
Reply #35

RobSteady

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
Does Octane ? I know only for sure that Redshift does, which is technically pretty revolutionary renderer. With that said, Out-of-Core almost always come with performance hit. It's not exactly like harddrive swapping, but neither a magic bullet solution.
Yes, it does. But you can only use it for textures, not geometry.
And yes, it comes with a little performance loss.