Poll

Which is better (less noise)

1
28 (82.4%)
2
6 (17.6%)

Total Members Voted: 34

Author Topic: Experiment: Noise levels  (Read 12773 times)

2014-09-15, 20:31:08

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
Which image has less noise? And how big difference do you see?

1:



2:
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2014-09-15, 20:42:26
Reply #1

zzubnik

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
By a slim margin, number two feels cleaner to my eyes, after tabbing between them in Photoshop for several minutes.


2014-09-15, 20:42:30
Reply #2

romullus

  • Global Moderator
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 8868
  • Let's move this topic, shall we?
    • View Profile
    • My Models
I think #1 has a little bit more uniform noise, so it seems like less noisy. But i'm very tolerant to noise, so for me, difference is almost imperceptible.
I'm not Corona Team member. Everything i say, is my personal opinion only.
My Models | My Videos | My Pictures

2014-09-15, 21:13:46
Reply #3

ecximer

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 286
  • Scriptobot
    • View Profile
№1.
the difference is noticeable, but not much.
sorry for my english

2014-09-15, 21:25:44
Reply #4

CiroC

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 506
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio
Nº1 for me. The render seems to have a better contrast.

2014-09-15, 21:27:06
Reply #5

Juraj

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 4765
    • View Profile
    • studio website
I also think number one, maybe because the 'grain' seems smaller to me ?
Brother thinks opposite (num2), he's not 3d artist.
Please follow my new Instagram for latest projects, tips&tricks, short video tutorials and free models
Behance  Probably best updated portfolio of my work
lysfaere.com Please check the new stuff!

2014-09-15, 22:42:05
Reply #6

Benjamin_F

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 49
    • View Profile
I think number one is more homogeneous, especially near the window.

2014-09-15, 22:42:49
Reply #7

johan belmans

  • Primary Certified Instructor
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 761
    • View Profile
    • belly.be

2014-09-15, 23:33:23
Reply #8

juang3d

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 636
    • View Profile
I agree with Benjamin_F, i used the wall near the window to make my choice.
Number one for me :)

Cheers.

2014-09-15, 23:39:17
Reply #9

Siahpoosh

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
    • Siahpoosh.Net
#1 , is there any difference in lighting ? i can see a different in candle shadow on the wall.

2014-09-16, 15:49:38
Reply #10

Captain Obvious

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 167
    • View Profile
"LtWCJTK.png" is marginally noisier. I measured. It's something like 2.4 % more noisy.

edit: So that's image 1 that's cleaner.

2014-09-16, 16:10:08
Reply #11

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
"LtWCJTK.png" is marginally noisier. I measured. It's something like 2.4 % more noisy.

edit: So that's image 1 that's cleaner.
How did you measure it without the reference image? If you have some reliable metric for estimating noise tell me, I can use it for adaptivity ;)
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2014-09-16, 16:23:34
Reply #12

steyin

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 375
  • BALLS
    • View Profile
    • Instagram Page
They look exactly the same to me.


2014-09-16, 18:24:04
Reply #14

pokoy

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1869
    • View Profile
No 1 feels cleaner, but no 2 seems to have a more uniform noise across the whole image.

2014-09-16, 18:45:22
Reply #15

Siahpoosh

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
    • Siahpoosh.Net
look at this

2014-09-16, 18:54:59
Reply #16

elindell

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
1 also feels cleaner if I scrub back and forth between them, but honestly just eyeballing it they look of equal noisiness

2014-09-16, 19:44:40
Reply #17

maru

  • Corona Team
  • Active Users
  • ****
  • Posts: 12780
  • Marcin
    • View Profile
I think the two images are extremely similar in terms of noise but if I had to choose, I would pick #1. Looks like it has (at least perceptually) less noise in the direct lighted area near the window. But I wouldn't be surprised if Keymaster was testing us and the two images were identically noisy. ;)
Marcin Miodek | chaos-corona.com
3D Support Team Lead - Corona | contact us

2014-09-16, 19:55:54
Reply #18

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 9048
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
#1 is less noisy. It uses one trick from recent paper about sampling. It will be probably included in daily build soon
Rendering is magic.How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2014-09-16, 20:23:39
Reply #19

Siahpoosh

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
    • Siahpoosh.Net
"LtWCJTK.png" is marginally noisier. I measured. It's something like 2.4 % more noisy.

edit: So that's image 1 that's cleaner.
How did you measure it without the reference image? If you have some reliable metric for estimating noise tell me, I can use it for adaptivity ;)
Maybe this could help :
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/LOCAL_COPIES/VELDHUIZEN/node18.html

2014-09-16, 20:29:17
Reply #20

Chakib

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 787
  • Corona Omnomnomer !
    • View Profile
I can see that the first image had a liiiittle bit less noise  than the second one, especially on the back of the chair.

2014-09-16, 20:38:30
Reply #21

zzubnik

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Well, I guess I'm going blind. I really struggled to make out much overall difference. I think I need glasses!

2014-09-16, 20:50:35
Reply #22

filipskrzat

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
#1 is less noisy

2014-09-16, 23:11:02
Reply #23

juang3d

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 636
    • View Profile
Awesome :D

Will this make the images look cleaner sooner?

Cheers

2014-09-17, 00:29:38
Reply #24

cecofuli

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1577
    • View Profile
    • www.francescolegrenzi.com
Maybe... are you working also on "noise pattern flickering" problem?  =^___^=

2014-09-17, 09:25:50
Reply #25

Captain Obvious

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 167
    • View Profile
"LtWCJTK.png" is marginally noisier. I measured. It's something like 2.4 % more noisy.

edit: So that's image 1 that's cleaner.
How did you measure it without the reference image? If you have some reliable metric for estimating noise tell me, I can use it for adaptivity ;)
I just measured the maximum deviance between each pixels and its neighbours. It doesn't work for calculating the error in a single image (you need the reference image for that), but it works for checking which of two images have the greater variance.

2014-09-17, 09:49:59
Reply #26

gabrielefx

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
try to reduce the noise putting 50 ies or tiny emitters inside the room.

2014-09-17, 11:17:45
Reply #27

Zom-B

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
#1 is less noisy. It uses one trick from recent paper about sampling. It will be probably included in daily build soon
There is a very simple way to tell what image has less noise: File size for the PNG!
PNGs are super mega sensible to noise vs filesize ratio.

2014-09-17, 13:31:03
Reply #28

cecofuli

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 1577
    • View Profile
    • www.francescolegrenzi.com
try to reduce the noise putting 50 ies or tiny emitters inside the room.

Can you explain better?

2014-09-28, 15:39:31
Reply #29

boumay

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
try to reduce the noise putting 50 ies or tiny emitters inside the room.
Yes it would be interesting to know more