Messages

31

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Depth of Field Highlights Solver playground!

« on: 2023-08-13, 18:56:25 »

Hi there, are you using the viewport IR for this? Does it happen if you run a default or final render?

please use cinema c4 r21  to get this "effect"

32

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Depth of Field Highlights Solver playground!

« on: 2023-08-10, 15:43:52 »

hello here a test scene,
it seems to be related to bloom & glare, a refractive material and or a self illuminated material, test the scene once without and with the highlight solver and leave both rendering bllom and glare on

33

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Depth of Field Highlights Solver playground!

« on: 2023-08-10, 15:10:57 »

my scene is extreme bright when i enable the new highlight solver
i have two sky objects (first only visible directly, second only reflect, frfract and Gi) the sceneis loaded within a xref object
any ideas?

34

[C4D] I need help! / Re: Surface imperfections texture + more

« on: 2023-07-27, 17:36:27 »

Hi im relativly new to coronna and c4d
I have to recreate the given photo.
My question ist: How do I correctly apply the scratches/smudges shader for the floor ?

Somehow multiply does not work in the material node editor (see screenshots) and I cant get the result right..
The multiply layer mode doesnt do anything actually. in normal/add layer mode the white part of the shader is visible..


thanks in advance

you are trying to multiply the map with a not visible layer
you dont have to multiply, only when you want to create some variation to the map (like differnt patterns) but there arent any other layers visible
additionally use a filter (use contast or brightness here) between the map to enhance or attenuate the effect


for this material i would create a layered material with two colors. first this oker color and then this slightly green bluish color. you can easily combine both materials using masks (layered noise maps or texture maps). I would then use bump maps and different levels of reflection for both materials, so that the floor achieves a more worn look. Finally, I would put a few imperfaction maps over it, depending on that.

35

[C4D] Feature Requests / Support for AMD GPU Denoiser ?

« on: 2023-07-27, 16:00:26 »

hello, we have purchased amd graphics cards and therefore can no longer use the Nvidea (fast preview) denoiser. Is it possible to integrate something like the nvidea denoiser for amd graphics cards. I have seen that there is also a denoiser from amd, but I do not know if you can denoise via the gpu.

https://gpuopen.com/fidelityfx-denoiser/#features
https://gpuopen.com/radeon-image-filtering-library/


would be in any case a great added value.
tuami

36

[C4D] Feature Requests / Re: Dock Cosmos in C4D UI

« on: 2023-07-25, 10:24:21 »

on windows you cant dock cosmos in cinema 4d

37

[C4D] Feature Requests / Dock Cosmos in C4D UI

« on: 2023-07-06, 09:35:11 »

hello, i read that the corona material library system will be integrated into cosmos.

https://trello.com/c/CnYaaKq8/131-unify-cosmos-and-corona-material-library

Since Cosmos is (currently) not dockable in the Cinema 4D layout, I wonder how this will look in the future. Would be wonderful the possibility to dock Cosmos in Cinema 4D Layout.

38

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Scattering on scatters Playground!

« on: 2023-06-02, 11:51:39 »

Thanks!

39

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Scattering on scatters Playground!

« on: 2023-06-02, 08:01:12 »

Hey TomG,
scene is attached above =)

40

[C4D] Daily Builds / Re: Scattering on scatters Playground!

« on: 2023-06-01, 19:01:08 »

nice but wont work for me or did i something wrong?
latest daily, r21

41

Hardware / Re: New PC 7950x vs 7950x3d

« on: 2023-05-09, 16:21:21 »

I looked into this a little while back. In the end the conclusion of most of the reviews I read at the time were that the standard 7950x was better for work (rendering etc) and the 3D version was better for games.
Your choice.

yes, i agree. here are some 7950x + 3D Benchmarks
https://www.anandtech.com/show/18747/the-amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-review-amd-s-fastest-gaming-processor/5

42

Hardware / Re: New CPU, Motherboard and RAM

« on: 2023-04-25, 09:42:00 »

it has to be DDR5 RAM.
here so far our setup

AM5 ATX Asus ProArt X670-E DDR5/M.2/1xRJ45 10Gbit
AMD Ryzen9 7950X AM5 X16 4.7Ghz Box 12x768KB/12MB/64MB
Corsair Hydro H150i RGB Elite 3
DDR5 64GB 5600Mhz CL36 G.Skill RS5K Kitof2
2000GB M.2 NVMeG4 7450/6900MB Samsung 990 PRO
16GB PCI-E AMD RX6800XT Asus TUF OC 3xDP/1xHDMI
BeQuiet P4/P8
BE Quiet StraightPower11 1200W 80+ Platinum

cheers

43

Hardware / Re: New CPU, Motherboard and RAM

« on: 2023-04-06, 13:56:06 »

We are also going to build up new workstations, heres our setup (Without Ram, Cooling, Power and Case:
Price Range will be 2500-2900 € when its build up.
CPU: AMD 7950x
Motherboard: ASUS ProArt X670E (If you work with a 10Gbit Network)
DDR5:
Graphics:  RX 6800 XT
Samsung M2 Pro 1TB

See Processor Benchmark
https://www.anandtech.com/show/18747/the-amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-review-amd-s-fastest-gaming-processor/5

You also can look around for an Intel 13900ks CPU.

Greetings

44

Hardware / Re: New PC 7950x vs 7950x3d

« on: 2023-03-22, 12:47:33 »

first result is here

7950x3D

https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/results/cpu/7950x3d

seems it is a bit slower than the 7950x but Freq. [GHz] is also lower (dont know it has rendered with its full potentical)

https://corona-renderer.com/benchmark/results/cpu/7950x

45

Hardware / New PC 7950x vs 7950x3d

« on: 2023-03-02, 21:37:21 »

Hey folk,
Because we build up new computers, Has anyone Informations between the Performance between These two CPUs with corona renderer?



Because the x3D has more Cache, does it mean render time will be performer?

Found this from another thread


6) Corona is heavily memory limited - this means that the CPU spends most of its time waiting for the memory to provide data to be operated on. This also means that the cache size and speed is one of the most important factors in Corona performance.

Source : https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php?topic=15784.0


Sure I think we have to wait for the first corona benchmark results to get more clearity, but it is already tingling in the fingers to assemble the new computers