Messages

1651

Gallery / Re: Coloruful Condo Bedroom

« on: 2016-05-17, 21:07:16 »

Don´t know if we mean the same: It´s only about the sockets inside the blind. I mean: the holes for the plug pins should be horizontally.

Like this:

https://mrright.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/content/assets/2015-11/medium/1f0e48956d514beda3ca0b6896eaa90c-power%20outlet%20and%20socket%20repair.jpg

If it´s real world - well I never would succeed in loading my cellphone there :)


Good Luck!

1652

[Max] I need help! / Re: multiple region DR

« on: 2016-05-17, 16:57:04 »

Not yet:

https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,7239.msg76210.html#msg76210

Good Luck

1653

[Max] I need help! / Re: Corona 1.4 errr....

« on: 2016-05-17, 16:19:36 »

Since there is the "INFO" section in cVFB, maybe it would be a good idea to display something like "Rendering and denoising cancelled." :)

Good Luck

1654

[Max] Resolved Bugs / Re: Hightlight Clamping: bad result

« on: 2016-05-17, 15:32:48 »

How many passes are these?

Good Luck

1655

Gallery / Re: Coloruful Condo Bedroom

« on: 2016-05-17, 13:15:01 »

Please rotate those power sockets correctly, I always have to stare at them  :)

Good Luck

1656

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Let's share noise limits!

« on: 2016-05-17, 13:06:16 »

You just shared my personal defaults :)

Good Luck

1657

[Max] I need help! / Re: Corona 1.4 errr....

« on: 2016-05-17, 12:55:23 »

Regarding the internal res?Has an alternative been provided or?

You should not need one. The (main) reasons for using bigger internal resolutions are now handled by adaptivity, denoising and Highlight clamping (can be found in the Image filter group).

Good Luck

1658

[Max] I need help! / Re: Corona 1.4 errr....

« on: 2016-05-17, 11:41:43 »

I'm also looking for the internal res section... has this been removed?

Yes.

Good Luck

1659

[Max] General Discussion / Re: is ambient occlusion neccessary in every render?

« on: 2016-05-13, 17:38:42 »

Ha, got it :)

Good Luck!

1660

[Max] I need help! / Re: Daily Build 1.4r6 crash at Render Start

« on: 2016-05-13, 17:36:54 »

Do i need to update 3dsmax 2016 to SP2?

Just a side note: Don´t install SP2 for Max 2016, install SP3. Serious issues relating to object hierarchy (making it impossible to work with groups for example) are fixed there. And if I remember correctly, they were introduced by SP2.

Good Luck

1661

[Max] I need help! / Re: struggling with metals

« on: 2016-05-13, 13:50:57 »

Yes, it´s different, different technology. To achieve the same with Corona you have to pull out the swiss army knife: Corona Rayswitch Material.

See

https://coronarenderer.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/5000516723-how-to-disable-shadow-casting-of-an-object-

This is exactly what happens here.


Good Luck!

Edit: It´s now projected to wrap it automatically at rendertime:

https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php/topic,11965.msg77118.html#msg77118

I suggested this about 1 year ago after discussing those object property options and what users would expect, gave up and was told that I may write my own maxscript material using rayswitch to achieve this ;) Glad to see this very important step of a perfect max integration now in the first 1.5 daily

1662

[Max] I need help! / Re: struggling with metals

« on: 2016-05-13, 13:26:33 »

And the plane-to-reflect (look into the mirrorball) is strangely bright, seems like "Cast Shadows" is disabled on the object.

Good Luck

1663

[Max] I need help! / Re: Problem after instaling Corona 1.4 RC5

« on: 2016-05-13, 12:51:09 »

The missing dll is part of the Visual C++ runtime libraries which should come with the Corona installer and/or a windows update. Is your windows (which one?) up to date? Afaik various windows updates are a requirement to get them installed.

Good Luck

1664

[Max] General Discussion / Re: is ambient occlusion neccessary in every render?

« on: 2016-05-13, 12:17:52 »

I would tell opposite.

*tilt*

I think we both judged the same :)

Good Luck

1665

[Max] Daily Builds / Re: Daily Builds

« on: 2016-05-13, 09:52:55 »

(...) to 9999mb which is max and which I would love to be able to set up even higher (...)

You may request this as a feature. If there is no real technical reason for this limit and just someone thought "hey, 640k 9999mb ought to be enough for anyone", it should be up to the user how much is used.

Good Luck