Messages

1

[Max] General Discussion / Re: corona standalone for linux?

« on: 2019-08-15, 12:29:14 »

+1 for the Linux version

2

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2018-02-26, 15:07:19 »

Maya+Max are absolute kings, everybody is using them. My vote went for Houdini though because Houdini is the sweetest package there is - although used mainly for effects, not visualizations. Also, built in renderer, Mantra, is pretty sweet.

By supporting Maya you would challenge Arnold which would be hard as everyody is using Arnold with Maya. For Houdini it's even worse.

So maybe you should introduce the support for the "funny" stuff if you want to make the most moneyz (Sketchup/Rhino/Revit)? There is no other real competition for you for those aside VRay. I personally use 3ds max the most, although due to the nature of my work, i use all 3d packages really.

Why so many modo votes? it's so unreliable! I'm shocked by modo's position in the list :)

3

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Corona command line rendering - frame padding

« on: 2018-02-26, 14:46:53 »

" So what you are requesting is that when you specify "output.jpg" and that file already exists, the output is written into output0001.jpg? "
yes, sorry for late response - thought you have enough info.

the issue is that when rendering 5th frame for example, it will not add padding (name.frameNumber = framename.0005) - that prevents rendering sequences using scenes exported to corona standalone scenes. i only submitted it becasue it's the standard option with vray,arnold and all others. using standalones helps to resolve certain issues and also allows one to render his animation faster, so that would be a prett yneat feature.

PS
haven't got time to fully test corona, but from my renderfarming experience (i'm the troubleshooter) i must say it behaves great! (compared to vray for example, arnold also has more issues :) )

4

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Corona command line rendering - frame padding

« on: 2017-01-19, 12:27:42 »

great, thank you, much apreciated :)

5

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Corona command line rendering - frame padding

« on: 2017-01-17, 21:59:28 »

Yes, sorry for not being as much precise as I could be. I am basically after adding frame number to the output render's name. For example: name_0001.png, name_0002.png and so on. By padding I've meant the number of chars reserved for frame number at the end. So frames named in the following manner: name_0001.png, name_0002.png have padding of 4, frames named: name_00001.png, name_00002.png have padding of 5 and so on.

6

[Max] Feature Requests / Corona command line rendering - frame padding

« on: 2017-01-15, 15:20:37 »

Hello guys. I work at company where command line rendering is very important. I've failed to find any info on the subject of frame padding. As i render using the standalone it saves only last frame from the entire range and without padding. That makes animation impossible to render and i couldn't find any info on that topic. Please help.

tested with:
Corona 1.5.2