Messages

31

[C4D] General Discussion / Re: Corona in C4D Material editor

« on: 2013-12-06, 00:46:34 »

Nice!
So..Where is Bump channel?

32

Gallery / Re: Vray USB Dongle

« on: 2013-08-01, 18:35:26 »

O_O Mein Gott. Perfectissimo))

33

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Vote for new Corona logo

« on: 2013-05-07, 14:22:39 »

Visually 3 or 4 best view

34

Porting and API / Re: Corona for 1 additional software

« on: 2013-04-25, 14:48:07 »

Awww, another raid :D

"From Russia with Love")))......this is not spam, and not raid))) It is only the desire to give you as a developer, to understand that you have to go in the direction of the more popular products based on their specialization. Visualization as such.

35

Porting and API / Re: Corona for 1 additional software

« on: 2013-04-25, 12:26:09 »

+1 for Cinema 4D
My choice is unambiguous - Cinema4d has no alternative but to vray4C4D, which lags behind its competitor 3dmax

36

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2013-03-19, 12:03:45 »

And besides - you have in advance so many potential Russian byers- which is nonsense in a century of torrent freedom! That sounds great! Go for it!

Yes.. it`s true! and We (C4D community) need this integration - very need

37

[Max] General Discussion / Re: Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene

« on: 2013-03-18, 15:19:30 »

win8 x64
I7-860 2.8 up to 3.8ghz
8gb
5:43

38

[Max] Feature Requests / Re: Which 3D soft to integrate into next?

« on: 2013-02-25, 15:52:14 »

I hope you decide to stat making this great render for C4D. IMHO it is most powerful software after Maya and Houdini but all render engines for it are either too slow, or just bad, or unfinished. Thus Corona could be the best for C4D. At least it could be extremely serious competitor with such render speed and render quality.

+100000
....we needed C4D integration!))