Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - prince_jr

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
Try this one. Simple model with only Chaos Cosmos assets and materials.
Rendered in about 12 min. 20 passes on a Mac Studio 20cores, 128 Gb, C4D 2024.1.0 and CR daily build 20 oktober 2024:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YzHB1oXmiF_qk0jtWkM3PgPPetIEDcmS/view?usp=sharing

Hello FRV

Thank you very much for your scene. I rendered it on both my Mac Studio M2 Ultra with 192GB and my i9 10900K iMac. Both running C4D2023 and Corona V10.

The results are exactly matching the Corona Benchmarks and Cinebench. So everything perfect with this scene and the power of the two computers. See attachments.

Mac Studio: 10:19
iMac i9: 23:38

The Mac Studio speeds up to 2.29x faster than the iMac in this scene with 100% power all way through. So we can for sure exclude thermal throttling problems.

There are two things I would like to test, as I think they could have an impact :

1. Changing the Blur-Scale of the Corona Bitmaps to -100%.

2. Changing all Corona-Bitmaps of this scene to Non-Corona-Bitmaps.

I will do the tests once I have some time.

Best – A

same here...10.19mins for grass scene

2
Mac Studio Ultra 128GB / c4d 2024 / corona 11 daily

Original Scene: 11.30

* copied eyerything  over in new scene : 9.32

** > put all textures in Corona Bitmap:  1.38 ( sic !!)

hope that helps

I can confirm your result...~1.38min > see attachment. also have a look at the rays/s total= almost 24'000'000
> rendered on mac studio m2 ultra, 24cores, 192gb

3
@ASIMO the strange thing with your sample scene is...the longer the scene renders, the fewer the rays/s (total) become.
> same rendertime (see attachment)
> also copied the whole scene into a new one. rendertime makes no difference.
>in other scenes i have constantly ~11'000'000rays/s

4
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-08-31, 21:50:10 »
compared to my apartment rendering (mac pro 2010, 12core, 3.46 ghz, 128gb) with 152mins in the other thread, 39mins with my new mac studio is fast :o) > 3.9x faster exactly.

5
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-08-31, 21:43:34 »
some may remember this thread here:
https://forum.corona-renderer.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=53f27ps93iqd7jar9dp9fg74nv&topic=33540.0;all

there we have a comparison of an architectural scene:
https://blog.corona-renderer.com/corona-c4d-a1-1/

i share my render now (3840x2160px, noise level 3.0%) > see attachment
i'm happy with the render time result, as 3d rendering is more of a part time job than a full time job for me.

@BigAl3D: i hope you now have an idea of ​​render times for the mac studio m2 ultra.
i wasn't able to render the grapes scene, because the scene loaded weird in the newest c4d-version. that's why i decided to use the apartment scene.

6
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-08-29, 21:00:01 »
hi folks
here's my result running the benchmark > see attachment

it's the same speed as the other ranked mac studio m2 ultra in the benchmark results.

7
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-08-06, 21:06:14 »
@wsiew can't answer your question finally. but corona basically is cpu related. others here can provide better information than me.

to me, it was important that i have a new mac studio that i can use for a long time. so, rather more ram than gpu cores. my main work is photography with heavy mediumformat raw files (semi self-employed), cad and lastly 3d-rendering. but rendering not for a living.

btw...i don't work in the video segment, so gpu is not prior to me. and the price of mac studio m2 ultra is enormous, too. i can't afford a maxed out mac studio m2 ultra. that's why chose between 60cores/192gb ram or 76cores/128gb

maybe there are some benchmarks on the web/youtube, which focus on 60 vs 76 cores. but i guess it's not a giant leap in performance. and the m2 ultra is a hell of a machine anyway.

8
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-08-04, 11:39:22 »
Just got my Mac Studio with the M2 ultra. I've uploaded the result of the benchmark to the user-submitted results for all who was waiting for that. The result is very similar to what PhilW posted before.

meanwhile i ordered a mac studio m2 ultra (24c, 60 cores gpu, 192gb ram, 4tb ssd). should arrive in about 3 weeks. will post the benchmark when the new mac is ready to use.

9
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-07-07, 19:58:29 »
Here's the score for the Ultra...

thanks for the benchmark. :o) so, this is it…11.0m r/s for mac studio m2 ultra!?
i’m curious, does ram (128gb or 192gb) have an additional impact on faster render times? because the benchmark test was done with (only) 64gb ram.

10
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-06-30, 09:41:22 »
Looking forward to some actual M2 ultra scores though so I don’t have to speculate…

me, too! considering one of these configurations...
1. mac studio m2 ultra 24c, 60gb gpu, 192gb, 4tb ssd
2. mac studio m2 ultra 24c, 76gb gpu, 128gb, 4tb ssd

not sure if i really need the 76gb gpu...firstly i do photography (medium format > lightroom/capture one), then 3d-rendering (semi professional) and graphic design. in case of 3d-rendering would there be a difference between these two configurations?

11
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-06-28, 22:12:26 »
@Philw
this would be cool! :oD my maxed out mac pro 12c, 3.46ghz, 128gb (2010) scores 2.3M r/s (osx mojave).
a 5x boost would be insane!!! :o)

12
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-06-28, 21:38:27 »
@davetwo
does your m2 max benchmark-result mean that a mac studio m2 ultra will give a score around 11'4M r/s?

13
[C4D] General Discussion / Re: mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-06-26, 22:01:40 »
cool, thx for the first impressions and benchmarks.
can somebody run the new benchmark with a mac studio ultra m1 and m2, please?

14
[C4D] General Discussion / mac studio / mac pro m2 ultra
« on: 2023-06-15, 18:46:33 »
hi corona users
i'm still running a maxed out mac pro from 2010 (5.1) at home > 12c, 3.46ghz, 128gb ram.
but as apple released a new version of the mac studio and finally the new mac pro, i'm suggesting to buy a new apple computer. rather a mac studio than a mac pro.

it would be nice to get some real world benchmarks in this thread. does anybody already have the mac studio m2 ultra on his/her desk and can share some infos about working in the viewport, maybe some render times and other important facts?

@corona-team: i guess corona benchmark v2 (optimized for apple silicon) is just around the corner?

thanks for your inputs and thoughts. i'm curious what y'all have to share in the near future. :o)

15
Gallery / Re: Pink and snow
« on: 2022-09-24, 11:14:19 »
@dyatlov.studio it looks very realistic...great job!
how did you make the snow in general and how did you accomplish the snow on the path (footprints, piles of snow)?
i'd love to get some insight in your work. (what did you use...plugin, displacement, material etc.?)

thank you! :o)

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6